Sara Imari Walker

Yanbo Zhang, Sara Imari Walker

The high-dimesionality, non-linearity and emergent properties of complex systems pose a challenge to identifying general laws in the same manner that has been so successful in simpler physical systems. In Anderson's seminal work on why "more is different" he pointed to how emergent, macroscale patterns break symmetries of the underlying microscale laws. Yet, less recognized is that these large-scale, emergent patterns must also retain some symmetries of the microscale rules. Here we introduce a new, relational macrostate theory (RMT) that defines macrostates in terms of symmetries between two mutually predictive observations, and develop a machine learning architecture, MacroNet, that identifies macrostates. Using this framework, we show how macrostates can be identifed across systems ranging in complexity from the simplicity of the simple harmonic oscillator to the much more complex spatial patterning characteristic of Turing instabilities. Furthermore, we show how our framework can be used for the inverse design of microstates consistent with a given macroscopic property -- in Turing patterns this allows us to design underlying rule with a given specification of spatial patterning, and to identify which rule parameters most control these patterns. By demonstrating a general theory for how macroscopic properties emerge from conservation of symmetries in the mapping between observations, we provide a machine learning framework that allows a unified approach to identifying macrostates in systems from the simple to complex, and allows the design of new examples consistent with a given macroscopic property.

Stuart M. Marshall, Douglas Moore, Alastair R. G. Murray et al.

We have developed the concept of pathway assembly to explore the amount of extrinsic information required to build an object. To quantify this information in an agnostic way, we present a method to determine the amount of pathway assembly information contained within such an object by deconstructing the object into its irreducible parts, and then evaluating the minimum number of steps to reconstruct the object along any pathway. The mathematical formalisation of this approach uses an assembly space. By finding the minimal number of steps contained in the route by which the objects can be assembled within that space, we can compare how much information (I) is gained from knowing this pathway assembly index (PA) according to I_PA=log (|N|)/(|N_PA |) where, for an end product with PA=x, N is the set of objects possible that can be created from the same irreducible parts within x steps regardless of PA, and NPA is the subset of those objects with the precise pathway assembly index PA=x. Applying this formalism to objects formed in 1D, 2D and 3D space allows us to identify objects in the world or wider Universe that have high assembly numbers. We propose that objects with PA greater than a threshold are important because these are uniquely identifiable as those that must have been produced by biological or technological processes, rather than the assembly occurring via unbiased random processes alone. We think this approach is needed to help identify the new physical and chemical laws needed to understand what life is, by quantifying what life does.

Alyssa M Adams, Hector Zenil, Paul CW Davies et al.

Open-ended evolution (OEE) is relevant to a variety of biological, artificial and technological systems, but has been challenging to reproduce in silico. Most theoretical efforts focus on key aspects of open-ended evolution as it appears in biology. We recast the problem as a more general one in dynamical systems theory, providing simple criteria for open-ended evolution based on two hallmark features: unbounded evolution and innovation. We define unbounded evolution as patterns that are non-repeating within the expected Poincare recurrence time of an equivalent isolated system, and innovation as trajectories not observed in isolated systems. As a case study, we implement novel variants of cellular automata (CA) in which the update rules are allowed to vary with time in three alternative ways. Each is capable of generating conditions for open-ended evolution, but vary in their ability to do so. We find that state-dependent dynamics, widely regarded as a hallmark of life, statistically out-performs other candidate mechanisms, and is the only mechanism to produce open-ended evolution in a scalable manner, essential to the notion of ongoing evolution. This analysis suggests a new framework for unifying mechanisms for generating OEE with features distinctive to life and its artifacts, with broad applicability to biological and artificial systems.