Rémi Nahon

LG
h-index2
3papers
18citations
Novelty42%
AI Score30

3 Papers

3.8LGMar 20, 2023
Optimized preprocessing and Tiny ML for Attention State Classification

Yinghao Wang, Rémi Nahon, Enzo Tartaglione et al.

In this paper, we present a new approach to mental state classification from EEG signals by combining signal processing techniques and machine learning (ML) algorithms. We evaluate the performance of the proposed method on a dataset of EEG recordings collected during a cognitive load task and compared it to other state-of-the-art methods. The results show that the proposed method achieves high accuracy in classifying mental states and outperforms state-of-the-art methods in terms of classification accuracy and computational efficiency.

6.4LGMar 21, 2024
Debiasing surgeon: fantastic weights and how to find them

Rémi Nahon, Ivan Luiz De Moura Matos, Van-Tam Nguyen et al.

Nowadays an ever-growing concerning phenomenon, the emergence of algorithmic biases that can lead to unfair models, emerges. Several debiasing approaches have been proposed in the realm of deep learning, employing more or less sophisticated approaches to discourage these models from massively employing these biases. However, a question emerges: is this extra complexity really necessary? Is a vanilla-trained model already embodying some ``unbiased sub-networks'' that can be used in isolation and propose a solution without relying on the algorithmic biases? In this work, we show that such a sub-network typically exists, and can be extracted from a vanilla-trained model without requiring additional training. We further validate that such specific architecture is incapable of learning a specific bias, suggesting that there are possible architectural countermeasures to the problem of biases in deep neural networks.

8.8LGMay 5, 2023Code
Mining bias-target Alignment from Voronoi Cells

Rémi Nahon, Van-Tam Nguyen, Enzo Tartaglione

Despite significant research efforts, deep neural networks are still vulnerable to biases: this raises concerns about their fairness and limits their generalization. In this paper, we propose a bias-agnostic approach to mitigate the impact of bias in deep neural networks. Unlike traditional debiasing approaches, we rely on a metric to quantify ``bias alignment/misalignment'' on target classes, and use this information to discourage the propagation of bias-target alignment information through the network. We conduct experiments on several commonly used datasets for debiasing and compare our method to supervised and bias-specific approaches. Our results indicate that the proposed method achieves comparable performance to state-of-the-art supervised approaches, although it is bias-agnostic, even in presence of multiple biases in the same sample.