Michael Zinn

RO
h-index25
4papers
31citations
Novelty50%
AI Score23

4 Papers

3.0ROSep 28, 2021
Affordance Template Registration via Human-in-the-loop Corrections

Michael Hagenow, Michael Zinn, Terrence Fong et al.

Affordance Templates (ATs) are a method for parameterizing objects for autonomous robot manipulations. In this approach, instances of an object are registered by positioning a model in a 3D environment, which requires a large amount of user input. We instead propose a registration method which combines autonomy and user corrections. For selected objects, the system determines both the model and corresponding pose autonomously. The user makes corrections only if the model or pose is incorrect. This method increases the level of autonomy compared to existing approaches which can reduce user input and time on task. In this paper, we present an overview of existing methods, a description of our method, preliminary results, and planned future work.

5.3ROAug 10, 2021
Recognizing Orientation Slip in Human Demonstrations

Michael Hagenow, Bolun Zhang, Bilge Mutlu et al.

Manipulations of a constrained object often use a non-rigid grasp that allows the object to rotate relative to the end effector. This orientation slip strategy is often present in natural human demonstrations, yet it is generally overlooked in methods to identify constraints from such demonstrations. In this paper, we present a method to model and recognize prehensile orientation slip in human demonstrations of constrained interactions. Using only observations of an end effector, we can detect the type of constraint, parameters of the constraint, and orientation slip properties. Our method uses a novel hierarchical model selection method that is informed by multiple origins of physics-based evidence. A study with eight participants shows that orientation slip occurs in natural demonstrations and confirms that it can be detected by our method.

4.1ROOct 29, 2020
A Method for Constraint Inference Using Pose and Wrench Measurements

Guru Subramani, Michael Hagenow, Michael Gleicher et al.

Many physical tasks such as pulling out a drawer or wiping a table can be modeled with geometric constraints. These geometric constraints are characterized by restrictions on kinematic trajectories and reaction wrenches (forces and moments) of objects under the influence of the constraint. This paper presents a method to infer geometric constraints involving unmodeled objects in human demonstrations using both kinematic and wrench measurements. Our approach takes a recording of a human demonstration and determines what constraints are present, when they occur, and their parameters (e.g. positions). By using both kinematic and wrench information, our methods are able to reliably identify a variety of constraint types, even if the constraints only exist for short durations within the demonstration. We present a systematic approach to fitting arbitrary scleronomic constraint models to kinematic and wrench measurements. Reaction forces are estimated from measurements by removing friction. Position, orientation, force, and moment error metrics are developed to provide systematic comparison between constraint models. By conducting a user study, we show that our methods can reliably identify constraints in realistic situations and confirm the value of including forces and moments in the model regression and selection process.

14.6ROSep 29, 2018
Inferring geometric constraints in human demonstrations

Guru Subramani, Michael Zinn, Michael Gleicher

This paper presents an approach for inferring geometric constraints in human demonstrations. In our method, geometric constraint models are built to create representations of kinematic constraints such as fixed point, axial rotation, prismatic motion, planar motion and others across multiple degrees of freedom. Our method infers geometric constraints using both kinematic and force/torque information. The approach first fits all the constraint models using kinematic information and evaluates them individually using position, force and moment criteria. Our approach does not require information about the constraint type or contact geometry; it can determine both simultaneously. We present experimental evaluations using instrumented tongs that show how constraints can be robustly inferred in recordings of human demonstrations.