Shihao Zou

Shihao Zou, Xianying Huang, Xudong Shen

Emotion Recognition in Conversation (ERC) plays an important role in driving the development of human-machine interaction. Emotions can exist in multiple modalities, and multimodal ERC mainly faces two problems: (1) the noise problem in the cross-modal information fusion process, and (2) the prediction problem of less sample emotion labels that are semantically similar but different categories. To address these issues and fully utilize the features of each modality, we adopted the following strategies: first, deep emotion cues extraction was performed on modalities with strong representation ability, and feature filters were designed as multimodal prompt information for modalities with weak representation ability. Then, we designed a Multimodal Prompt Transformer (MPT) to perform cross-modal information fusion. MPT embeds multimodal fusion information into each attention layer of the Transformer, allowing prompt information to participate in encoding textual features and being fused with multi-level textual information to obtain better multimodal fusion features. Finally, we used the Hybrid Contrastive Learning (HCL) strategy to optimize the model's ability to handle labels with few samples. This strategy uses unsupervised contrastive learning to improve the representation ability of multimodal fusion and supervised contrastive learning to mine the information of labels with few samples. Experimental results show that our proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art models in ERC on two benchmark datasets.

Shihao Zou, Zhonghua Li, Mohammad Akbari et al.

When estimating the relevancy between a query and a document, ranking models largely neglect the mutual information among documents. A common wisdom is that if two documents are similar in terms of the same query, they are more likely to have similar relevance score. To mitigate this problem, in this paper, we propose a multi-agent reinforced ranking model, named MarlRank. In particular, by considering each document as an agent, we formulate the ranking process as a multi-agent Markov Decision Process (MDP), where the mutual interactions among documents are incorporated in the ranking process. To compute the ranking list, each document predicts its relevance to a query considering not only its own query-document features but also its similar documents features and actions. By defining reward as a function of NDCG, we can optimize our model directly on the ranking performance measure. Our experimental results on two LETOR benchmark datasets show that our model has significant performance gains over the state-of-art baselines. We also find that the NDCG shows an overall increasing trend along with the step of interactions, which demonstrates that the mutual information among documents helps improve the ranking performance.

Shihao Zou, Guanyu Tao, Jun Wang et al.

In this paper, we study jointly query reformulation and document relevance estimation, the two essential aspects of information retrieval (IR). Their interactions are modelled as a two-player strategic game: one player, a query formulator, taking actions to produce the optimal query, is expected to maximize its own utility with respect to the relevance estimation of documents produced by the other player, a retrieval modeler; simultaneously, the retrieval modeler, taking actions to produce the document relevance scores, needs to optimize its likelihood from the training data with respect to the refined query produced by the query formulator. Their equilibrium or equilibria will be reached when both are the best responses to each other. We derive our equilibrium theory of IR using normal-form representations: when a standard relevance feedback algorithm is coupled with a retrieval model, they would share the same objective function and thus form a partnership game; by contrast, pseudo relevance feedback pursues a rather different objective than that of retrieval models, therefore the interaction between them would lead to a general-sum game (though implicitly collaborative). Our game-theoretical analyses not only yield useful insights into the two major aspects of IR, but also offer new practical algorithms for achieving the equilibrium state of retrieval which have been shown to bring consistent performance improvements in both text retrieval and item recommendation.