0.6CLFeb 24Code
Adaptive Text Anonymization: Learning Privacy-Utility Trade-offs via Prompt OptimizationGabriel Loiseau, Damien Sileo, Damien Riquet et al.
Anonymizing textual documents is a highly context-sensitive problem: the appropriate balance between privacy protection and utility preservation varies with the data domain, privacy objectives, and downstream application. However, existing anonymization methods rely on static, manually designed strategies that lack the flexibility to adjust to diverse requirements and often fail to generalize across domains. We introduce adaptive text anonymization, a new task formulation in which anonymization strategies are automatically adapted to specific privacy-utility requirements. We propose a framework for task-specific prompt optimization that automatically constructs anonymization instructions for language models, enabling adaptation to different privacy goals, domains, and downstream usage patterns. To evaluate our approach, we present a benchmark spanning five datasets with diverse domains, privacy constraints, and utility objectives. Across all evaluated settings, our framework consistently achieves a better privacy-utility trade-off than existing baselines, while remaining computationally efficient and effective on open-source language models, with performance comparable to larger closed-source models. Additionally, we show that our method can discover novel anonymization strategies that explore different points along the privacy-utility trade-off frontier.
TAROT: Task-Oriented Authorship Obfuscation Using Policy Optimization MethodsGabriel Loiseau, Damien Sileo, Damien Riquet et al.
Authorship obfuscation aims to disguise the identity of an author within a text by altering the writing style, vocabulary, syntax, and other linguistic features associated with the text author. This alteration needs to balance privacy and utility. While strong obfuscation techniques can effectively hide the author's identity, they often degrade the quality and usefulness of the text for its intended purpose. Conversely, maintaining high utility tends to provide insufficient privacy, making it easier for an adversary to de-anonymize the author. Thus, achieving an optimal trade-off between these two conflicting objectives is crucial. In this paper, we propose TAROT: Task-Oriented Authorship Obfuscation Using Policy Optimization, a new unsupervised authorship obfuscation method whose goal is to optimize the privacy-utility trade-off by regenerating the entire text considering its downstream utility. Our approach leverages policy optimization as a fine-tuning paradigm over small language models in order to rewrite texts by preserving author identity and downstream task utility. We show that our approach largely reduces the accuracy of attackers while preserving utility. We make our code and models publicly available.
NL-Augmenter: A Framework for Task-Sensitive Natural Language AugmentationKaustubh D. Dhole, Varun Gangal, Sebastian Gehrmann et al.
Data augmentation is an important component in the robustness evaluation of models in natural language processing (NLP) and in enhancing the diversity of the data they are trained on. In this paper, we present NL-Augmenter, a new participatory Python-based natural language augmentation framework which supports the creation of both transformations (modifications to the data) and filters (data splits according to specific features). We describe the framework and an initial set of 117 transformations and 23 filters for a variety of natural language tasks. We demonstrate the efficacy of NL-Augmenter by using several of its transformations to analyze the robustness of popular natural language models. The infrastructure, datacards and robustness analysis results are available publicly on the NL-Augmenter repository (https://github.com/GEM-benchmark/NL-Augmenter).
2.3QUANT-PHFeb 2, 2025
Online Learning of Pure States is as Hard as Mixed StatesMaxime Meyer, Soumik Adhikary, Naixu Guo et al.
Quantum state tomography, the task of learning an unknown quantum state, is a fundamental problem in quantum information. In standard settings, the complexity of this problem depends significantly on the type of quantum state that one is trying to learn, with pure states being substantially easier to learn than general mixed states. A natural question is whether this separation holds for any quantum state learning setting. In this work, we consider the online learning framework and prove the surprising result that learning pure states in this setting is as hard as learning mixed states. More specifically, we show that both classes share almost the same sequential fat-shattering dimension, leading to identical regret scaling. We also generalize previous results on full quantum state tomography in the online setting to (i) the $ε$-realizable setting and (ii) learning the density matrix only partially, using smoothed analysis.
1.6CLJul 4, 2020
Text Data Augmentation: Towards better detection of spear-phishing emailsMehdi Regina, Maxime Meyer, Sébastien Goutal
Text data augmentation, i.e., the creation of new textual data from an existing text, is challenging. Indeed, augmentation transformations should take into account language complexity while being relevant to the target Natural Language Processing (NLP) task (e.g., Machine Translation, Text Classification). Initially motivated by an application of Business Email Compromise (BEC) detection, we propose a corpus and task agnostic augmentation framework used as a service to augment English texts within our company. Our proposal combines different methods, utilizing BERT language model, multi-step back-translation and heuristics. We show that our augmentation framework improves performances on several text classification tasks using publicly available models and corpora as well as on a BEC detection task. We also provide a comprehensive argumentation about the limitations of our augmentation framework.
3.1CRDec 13, 2016
Exploiting re-voting in the Helios election systemMaxime Meyer, Ben Smyth
Election systems must ensure that representatives are chosen by voters. Moreover, each voter should have equal influence. Traditionally, this has been achieved by permitting voters to cast at most one ballot. More recently, this has been achieved by tallying the last ballot cast by each voter. We show this is not achieved by the Helios election system, because an adversary can cause a ballot other than a voter's last to be tallied. Moreover, we show how the adversary can choose the contents of such a ballot, thus the adversary can unduly influence the selection of representatives.