Marx Viana

Marx Viana, Lauro Caetano, Francisco Cunha et al.

The rapidly changing environments in which companies operate to support the Internet of Things (IoT) and Autonomous Vehicles is challenging traditional Multi agent System (MAS) approaches. The requirements of these highly dynamic environments gave rise to Adaptive Normative MAS approaches. At the same time, governance is an essential and challenging feature that still needs to be addressed in adaptive normative MAS. Indeed, governance of individual and societal agent behavior in Adaptive Normative MASs is still a vague concept that has not been properly investigated, modeled and implemented. However, governance is fundamental for solving problems involving MAS coordination, organizations and institutions. In this paper, we present our ongoing research towards understanding and improving governance in Adaptive Normative MASs. We also discuss challenges and future directions that will facilitate the development of domain specific smart IoT systems with governance features.

H. Villamizar, M. Kalinowski, M. Viana et al.

[Background] The rapidly changing business environments in which many companies operate is challenging traditional Requirements Engineering (RE) approaches. This gave rise to agile approaches for RE. Security, at the same time, is an essential non-functional requirement that still tends to be difficult to address in agile development contexts. Given the fuzzy notion of "agile" in context of RE and the difficulties of appropriately handling security requirements, the overall understanding of how to handle security requirements in agile RE is still vague. [Objective] Our goal is to characterize the publication landscape of approaches that handle security requirements in agile software projects. [Method] We conducted a systematic mapping to outline relevant work and contemporary gaps for future research. [Results] In total, we identified 21 studies that met our inclusion criteria, dated from 2005 to 2017. We found that the approaches typically involve modifying agile methods, introducing new artifacts (e.g., extending the concept of user story to abuser story), or introducing guidelines to handle security issues. We also identified limitations of using these approaches related to environment, people, effort and resources. [Conclusion] Our analysis suggests that more effort needs to be invested into empirically evaluating the existing approaches and that there is an avenue for future research in the direction of mitigating the identified limitations.