Dawei Zu

Tianchao Li, Shujian Yu, Xinrui Zu et al.

Contrastive learning is effective for aligning paired views or modalities, but alignment beyond two modalities remains non-trivial and comparatively underexplored. Pairwise CLIP-style losses decompose multi-modal alignment into independent two-way comparisons and therefore do not explicitly model higher-order dependencies among multiple modalities. Recent beyond-pairwise objectives approach this problem from statistical or geometric perspectives, but arbitrary-modality alignment still lacks a principled criterion for defining what each modality should preserve and compress relative to the others. We revisit arbitrary-modality alignment through the Information Bottleneck principle. In multi-modal learning, sufficiency should preserve information predictable from the remaining modalities, while minimality should compress modality-specific information not supported by them. This naturally leads to a One-vs-All view, where each modality is characterized with respect to the remaining modalities. We propose OVA-IB, an Information Bottleneck framework for arbitrary-modality alignment. OVA-IB optimizes a tractable One-vs-All contrastive lower bound for sufficiency connected to a Dual Total Correlation-style objective, uses a parameter-free geometry-aware projection score, and derives a tractable upper-bound regularizer for minimality by bounding each representation's dependence on its own input with representation distributions induced by the remaining modalities. Experiments on classification, regression, modality-agnostic evaluation, and cross-modal retrieval benchmarks demonstrate strong and robust performance.

Zhao Yang, Xinrui Zu, Jacob E. Kooi et al.

Reinforcement learning from expert videos across visually distinct domains is challenging due to the absence of reward signals and the presence of domain gaps. We introduce XIPER (Cross-domain Video Prediction Reward), a reward model for learning from expert videos collected in a visually different domain, where the agent's appearance differs due to factors such as color, morphology, or the sim-to-real gap. More specifically, XIPER trains a cross-domain video prediction model that maps agent observations into the expert domain and uses the prediction likelihood as a reward signal. Experiments on the DMC Color Suite (8 tasks) and DMC Body Suite (3 tasks) show that XIPER consistently outperforms baselines despite domain gaps such as differences in agent color and morphology. We further analyze XIPER on a sim-to-real transfer dataset, demonstrating that it produces meaningful reward signals for real-robot observations given only simulated expert videos. Code, pretrained models, datasets and video demonstrations can be found on our project webpage: https://sites.google.com/view/xiper

Zhao Yang, Yuxuan Jiang, Ting-Chih Chen et al.

Reinforcement learning (RL) has become central to LLM post-training, yet the methods that dominate current pipelines, PPO and GRPO, represent only a narrow slice of what RL offers. Understanding why these methods prevail, and what alternatives exist, requires a principled examination of the design decisions that underlie any RL algorithm. This survey organizes that examination around three stages of algorithm construction. We begin with MDP creation: how the reward function, state space, action space, termination condition, and discount factor are, or could be, defined for LLM training. We then turn to exploration, covering temperature sampling, entropy regularization, intrinsic motivation, tree search, and curriculum learning. Finally, we address learning along four classical RL dimensions: model-free versus model-based, value-based versus policy-based versus actor-critic, on-policy versus off-policy, and credit assignment, including both Monte Carlo methods, which rely on full return estimates, and bootstrapping methods, which update estimates using other learned predictions. Mapping the LLM literature onto this taxonomy reveals a strikingly non-uniform distribution of research effort. Critic-free policy gradients and Monte Carlo credit assignment are densely populated, while value-based methods, off-policy actor-critic training, and bootstrapping-based credit assignment remain largely unexplored despite well-established counterparts in classical RL. These gaps represent concrete opportunities for transferring proven RL techniques to LLM training. By making these gaps explicit alongside the methods that have proven effective, this survey offers researchers in both RL and LLMs a shared framework for understanding current practice and identifying promising directions for future work.