Lyndon Estes

Sam Khallaghi, Rahebe Abedi, Hanan Abou Ali et al.

The accuracy of mapping agricultural fields across large areas is steadily improving with high-resolution satellite imagery and deep learning (DL) models, even in regions where fields are small and geometrically irregular. However, developing effective DL models often requires large, expensive label datasets, typically available only for specific years or locations. This limits the ability to create annual maps essential for agricultural monitoring, as domain shifts occur between years and regions due to changes in farming practices and environmental conditions. The challenge is to design a model flexible enough to account for these shifts without needing yearly labels. While domain adaptation techniques or semi-supervised training are common solutions, we explored enhancing the model's generalization power. Our results indicate that a holistic approach is essential, combining methods to improve generalization. Specifically, using an area-based loss function, such as Tversky-focal loss (TFL), significantly improved predictions across multiple years. The use of different augmentation techniques helped to encode different types of invariance, particularly photometric augmentations encoded invariance to brightness changes, though they increased false positives. The combination of photometric augmentation, TFL loss, and MC-dropout produced the best results, although dropout alone led to more false negatives in subsequent year predictions. Additionally, the choice of input normalization had a significant impact, with the best results obtained when statistics were calculated either locally or across the entire dataset over all bands (lab and gab). We developed a workflow that enabled a U-Net model to generate effective multi-year crop maps over large areas. Our code, available at: https://github.com/agroimpacts/cnn-generalization-enhancement, will be regularly updated with improvements.

Sam Khallaghi, J. Ronald Eastman, Lyndon D. Estes

Semantic segmentation (classification) of Earth Observation imagery is a crucial task in remote sensing. This paper presents a comprehensive review of technical factors to consider when designing neural networks for this purpose. The review focuses on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), and transformer models, discussing prominent design patterns for these ANN families and their implications for semantic segmentation. Common pre-processing techniques for ensuring optimal data preparation are also covered. These include methods for image normalization and chipping, as well as strategies for addressing data imbalance in training samples, and techniques for overcoming limited data, including augmentation techniques, transfer learning, and domain adaptation. By encompassing both the technical aspects of neural network design and the data-related considerations, this review provides researchers and practitioners with a comprehensive and up-to-date understanding of the factors involved in designing effective neural networks for semantic segmentation of Earth Observation imagery.

Gedeon Muhawenayo, Caleb Robinson, Subash Khanal et al.

Large-scale maps of field boundaries are essential for agricultural monitoring tasks. Existing deep learning approaches for satellite-based field mapping are sensitive to illumination, spatial scale, and changes in geographic location. We conduct the first systematic evaluation of segmentation and geospatial foundation models (GFMs) for global field boundary delineation using the Fields of The World (FTW) benchmark. We evaluate 18 models under unified experimental settings, showing that a U-Net semantic segmentation model outperforms instance-based and GFM alternatives on a suite of performance and deployment metrics. We propose a new segmentation approach that combines a U-Net backbone, composite loss functions, and targeted data augmentations to enhance performance and robustness under real-world conditions. Our model achieves a 76\% IoU and 47\% object-F1 on FTW, an increase of 6\% and 9\% over the previous baseline. Our approach provides a practical framework for reliable, scalable, and reproducible field boundary delineation across model design, training, and inference. We release all models and model-derived field boundary datasets for five countries.

L. D. Estes, A. Wussah, M. Asipunu et al.

African agriculture is undergoing rapid transformation. Annual maps of crop fields are key to understanding the nature of this transformation, but such maps are currently lacking and must be developed using advanced machine learning models trained on high resolution remote sensing imagery. To enable the development of such models, we delineated field boundaries in 33,746 Planet images captured between 2017 and 2023 across the continent using a custom labeling platform with built-in procedures for assessing and mitigating label error. We collected 42,403 labels, including 7,204 labels arising from tasks dedicated to assessing label quality (Class 1 labels), 32,167 from sites mapped once by a single labeller (Class 2) and 3,032 labels from sites where 3 or more labellers were tasked to map the same location (Class 4). Class 1 labels were used to calculate labeller-specific quality scores, while Class 1 and 4 sites mapped by at least 3 labellers were used to further evaluate label uncertainty using a Bayesian risk metric. Quality metrics showed that label quality was moderately high (0.75) for measures of total field extent, but low regarding the number of individual fields delineated (0.33), and the position of field edges (0.05). These values are expected when delineating small-scale fields in 3-5 m resolution imagery, which can be too coarse to reliably distinguish smaller fields, particularly in dense croplands, and therefore requires substantial labeller judgement. Nevertheless, previous work shows that such labels can train effective field mapping models. Furthermore, this large, probabilistic sample on its own provides valuable insight into regional agricultural characteristics, highlighting variations in the median field size and density. The imagery and vectorized labels along with quality information is available for download from two public repositories.