Knut J. Strømmen

Knut J. Strømmen, Jim Tørresen, Ulysse Côté-Allard

The development of compact and energy-efficient wearable sensors has led to an increase in the availability of biosignals. To analyze these continuously recorded, and often multidimensional, time series at scale, being able to conduct meaningful unsupervised data segmentation is an auspicious target. A common way to achieve this is to identify change-points within the time series as the segmentation basis. However, traditional change-point detection algorithms often come with drawbacks, limiting their real-world applicability. Notably, they generally rely on the complete time series to be available and thus cannot be used for real-time applications. Another common limitation is that they poorly (or cannot) handle the segmentation of multidimensional time series. Consequently, the main contribution of this work is to propose a novel unsupervised segmentation algorithm for multidimensional time series named Latent Space Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation (LS-USS), which was designed to work easily with both online and batch data. When comparing LS-USS against other state-of-the-art change-point detection algorithms on a variety of real-world datasets, in both the offline and real-time setting, LS-USS systematically achieves on par or better performances.

Lorenzo Brigato, Rafael Morand, Knut Strømmen et al.

Recent advances in long-term time series forecasting have introduced numerous complex prediction models that consistently outperform previously published architectures. However, this rapid progression raises concerns regarding inconsistent benchmarking and reporting practices, which may undermine the reliability of these comparisons. Our position emphasizes the need to shift focus away from pursuing ever-more complex models and towards enhancing benchmarking practices through rigorous and standardized evaluation methods. To support our claim, we first perform a broad, thorough, and reproducible evaluation of the top-performing models on the most popular benchmark by training 3,500+ networks over 14 datasets. Then, through a comprehensive analysis, we find that slight changes to experimental setups or current evaluation metrics drastically shift the common belief that newly published results are advancing the state of the art. Our findings suggest the need for rigorous and standardized evaluation methods that enable more substantiated claims, including reproducible hyperparameter setups and statistical testing.