Tina Behnia

Tina Behnia, Ke Wang, Christos Thrampoulidis

Overparameterized models fail to generalize well in the presence of data imbalance even when combined with traditional techniques for mitigating imbalances. This paper focuses on imbalanced classification datasets, in which a small subset of the population -- a minority -- may contain features that correlate spuriously with the class label. For a parametric family of cross-entropy loss modifications and a representative Gaussian mixture model, we derive non-asymptotic generalization bounds on the worst-group error that shed light on the role of different hyper-parameters. Specifically, we prove that, when appropriately tuned, the recently proposed VS-loss learns a model that is fair towards minorities even when spurious features are strong. On the other hand, alternative heuristics, such as the weighted CE and the LA-loss, can fail dramatically. Compared to previous works, our bounds hold for more general models, they are non-asymptotic, and, they apply even at scenarios of extreme imbalance.

Puneesh Deora, Bhavya Vasudeva, Tina Behnia et al.

In-context learning (ICL) enables transformers to adapt to new tasks through contextual examples without parameter updates. While existing research has typically studied ICL in fixed-complexity environments, practical language models encounter tasks spanning diverse complexity levels. This paper investigates how transformers navigate hierarchical task structures where higher-complexity categories can perfectly represent any pattern generated by simpler ones. We design well-controlled testbeds based on Markov chains and linear regression that reveal transformers not only identify the appropriate complexity level for each task but also accurately infer the corresponding parameters--even when the in-context examples are compatible with multiple complexity hypotheses. Notably, when presented with data generated by simpler processes, transformers consistently favor the least complex sufficient explanation. We theoretically explain this behavior through a Bayesian framework, demonstrating that transformers effectively implement an in-context Bayesian Occam's razor by balancing model fit against complexity penalties. We further ablate on the roles of model size, training mixture distribution, inference context length, and architecture. Finally, we validate this Occam's razor-like inductive bias on a pretrained GPT-4 model with Boolean-function tasks as case study, suggesting it may be inherent to transformers trained on diverse task distributions.