Anthony D. Blaom

David Muhr, Michael Affenzeller, Anthony D. Blaom

OutlierDetection.jl is an open-source ecosystem for outlier detection in Julia. It provides a range of high-performance outlier detection algorithms implemented directly in Julia. In contrast to previous packages, our ecosystem enables the development highly-scalable outlier detection algorithms using a high-level programming language. Additionally, it provides a standardized, yet flexible, interface for future outlier detection algorithms and allows for model composition unseen in previous packages. Best practices such as unit testing, continuous integration, and code coverage reporting are enforced across the ecosystem. The most recent version of OutlierDetection.jl is available at https://github.com/OutlierDetectionJL/OutlierDetection.jl.

Anthony D. Blaom, Samuel Okon

A new computational tool TumorGrowth$.$jl for modeling tumor growth is introduced. The tool allows the comparison of standard textbook models, such as General Bertalanffy and Gompertz, with some newer models, including, for the first time, neural ODE models. As an application, we revisit a human meta-study of non-small cell lung cancer and bladder cancer lesions, in patients undergoing two different treatment options, to determine if previously reported performance differences are statistically significant, and if newer, more complex models perform any better. In a population of examples with at least four time-volume measurements available for calibration, and an average of about 6.3, our main conclusion is that the General Bertalanffy model has superior performance, on average. However, where more measurements are available, we argue that more complex models, capable of capturing rebound and relapse behavior, may be better choices.

Franz J. Király, Markus Löning, Anthony Blaom et al.

Machine learning (ML) and AI toolboxes such as scikit-learn or Weka are workhorses of contemporary data scientific practice -- their central role being enabled by usable yet powerful designs that allow to easily specify, train and validate complex modeling pipelines. However, despite their universal success, the key design principles in their construction have never been fully analyzed. In this paper, we attempt to provide an overview of key patterns in the design of AI modeling toolboxes, taking inspiration, in equal parts, from the field of software engineering, implementation patterns found in contemporary toolboxes, and our own experience from developing ML toolboxes. In particular, we develop a conceptual model for the AI/ML domain, with a new type system, called scientific types, at its core. Scientific types capture the scientific meaning of common elements in ML workflows based on the set of operations that we usually perform with them (i.e. their interface) and their statistical properties. From our conceptual analysis, we derive a set of design principles and patterns. We illustrate that our analysis can not only explain the design of existing toolboxes, but also guide the development of new ones. We intend our contribution to be a state-of-art reference for future toolbox engineers, a summary of best practices, a collection of ML design patterns which may become useful for future research, and, potentially, the first steps towards a higher-level programming paradigm for constructing AI.

Anthony D. Blaom, Sebastian J. Vollmer

A graph-based protocol called `learning networks' which combine assorted machine learning models into meta-models is described. Learning networks are shown to overcome several limitations of model composition as implemented in the dominant machine learning platforms. After illustrating the protocol in simple examples, a concise syntax for specifying a learning network, implemented in the MLJ framework, is presented. Using the syntax, it is shown that learning networks are are sufficiently flexible to include Wolpert's model stacking, with out-of-sample predictions for the base learners.