Bilal Khan

George E. Dahl, Frank Schneider, Zachary Nado et al. · deepmind, utoronto

Training algorithms, broadly construed, are an essential part of every deep learning pipeline. Training algorithm improvements that speed up training across a wide variety of workloads (e.g., better update rules, tuning protocols, learning rate schedules, or data selection schemes) could save time, save computational resources, and lead to better, more accurate, models. Unfortunately, as a community, we are currently unable to reliably identify training algorithm improvements, or even determine the state-of-the-art training algorithm. In this work, using concrete experiments, we argue that real progress in speeding up training requires new benchmarks that resolve three basic challenges faced by empirical comparisons of training algorithms: (1) how to decide when training is complete and precisely measure training time, (2) how to handle the sensitivity of measurements to exact workload details, and (3) how to fairly compare algorithms that require hyperparameter tuning. In order to address these challenges, we introduce a new, competitive, time-to-result benchmark using multiple workloads running on fixed hardware, the AlgoPerf: Training Algorithms benchmark. Our benchmark includes a set of workload variants that make it possible to detect benchmark submissions that are more robust to workload changes than current widely-used methods. Finally, we evaluate baseline submissions constructed using various optimizers that represent current practice, as well as other optimizers that have recently received attention in the literature. These baseline results collectively demonstrate the feasibility of our benchmark, show that non-trivial gaps between methods exist, and set a provisional state-of-the-art for future benchmark submissions to try and surpass.

Ahatsham Hayat, Bilal Khan, Mohammad Rashedul Hasan

We propose a novel approach to leveraging pre-trained language models (LMs) for early forecasting of academic trajectories in STEM students using high-dimensional longitudinal experiential data. This data, which captures students' study-related activities, behaviors, and psychological states, offers valuable insights for forecasting-based interventions. Key challenges in handling such data include high rates of missing values, limited dataset size due to costly data collection, and complex temporal variability across modalities. Our approach addresses these issues through a comprehensive data enrichment process, integrating strategies for managing missing values, augmenting data, and embedding task-specific instructions and contextual cues to enhance the models' capacity for learning temporal patterns. Through extensive experiments on a curated student learning dataset, we evaluate both encoder-decoder and decoder-only LMs. While our findings show that LMs effectively integrate data across modalities and exhibit resilience to missing data, they primarily rely on high-level statistical patterns rather than demonstrating a deeper understanding of temporal dynamics. Furthermore, their ability to interpret explicit temporal information remains limited. This work advances educational data science by highlighting both the potential and limitations of LMs in modeling student trajectories for early intervention based on longitudinal experiential data.