Arivazhagan G. Balasubramanian

h-index4
2papers
48citations

2 Papers

5.1IVAug 20, 2025
Potential and challenges of generative adversarial networks for super-resolution in 4D Flow MRI

Oliver Welin Odeback, Arivazhagan Geetha Balasubramanian, Jonas Schollenberger et al.

4D Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging (4D Flow MRI) enables non-invasive quantification of blood flow and hemodynamic parameters. However, its clinical application is limited by low spatial resolution and noise, particularly affecting near-wall velocity measurements. Machine learning-based super-resolution has shown promise in addressing these limitations, but challenges remain, not least in recovering near-wall velocities. Generative adversarial networks (GANs) offer a compelling solution, having demonstrated strong capabilities in restoring sharp boundaries in non-medical super-resolution tasks. Yet, their application in 4D Flow MRI remains unexplored, with implementation challenged by known issues such as training instability and non-convergence. In this study, we investigate GAN-based super-resolution in 4D Flow MRI. Training and validation were conducted using patient-specific cerebrovascular in-silico models, converted into synthetic images via an MR-true reconstruction pipeline. A dedicated GAN architecture was implemented and evaluated across three adversarial loss functions: Vanilla, Relativistic, and Wasserstein. Our results demonstrate that the proposed GAN improved near-wall velocity recovery compared to a non-adversarial reference (vNRMSE: 6.9% vs. 9.6%); however, that implementation specifics are critical for stable network training. While Vanilla and Relativistic GANs proved unstable compared to generator-only training (vNRMSE: 8.1% and 7.8% vs. 7.2%), a Wasserstein GAN demonstrated optimal stability and incremental improvement (vNRMSE: 6.9% vs. 7.2%). The Wasserstein GAN further outperformed the generator-only baseline at low SNR (vNRMSE: 8.7% vs. 10.7%). These findings highlight the potential of GAN-based super-resolution in enhancing 4D Flow MRI, particularly in challenging cerebrovascular regions, while emphasizing the need for careful selection of adversarial strategies.

4.3FLU-DYNJul 15, 2021
Predicting the near-wall region of turbulence through convolutional neural networks

A. G. Balasubramanian, L. Guastoni, A. Güemes et al.

Modelling the near-wall region of wall-bounded turbulent flows is a widespread practice to reduce the computational cost of large-eddy simulations (LESs) at high Reynolds number. As a first step towards a data-driven wall-model, a neural-network-based approach to predict the near-wall behaviour in a turbulent open channel flow is investigated. The fully-convolutional network (FCN) proposed by Guastoni et al. [preprint, arXiv:2006.12483] is trained to predict the two-dimensional velocity-fluctuation fields at $y^{+}_{\rm target}$, using the sampled fluctuations in wall-parallel planes located farther from the wall, at $y^{+}_{\rm input}$. The data for training and testing is obtained from a direct numerical simulation (DNS) at friction Reynolds numbers $Re_τ = 180$ and $550$. The turbulent velocity-fluctuation fields are sampled at various wall-normal locations, i.e. $y^{+} = \{15, 30, 50, 80, 100, 120, 150\}$. At $Re_τ=550$, the FCN can take advantage of the self-similarity in the logarithmic region of the flow and predict the velocity-fluctuation fields at $y^{+} = 50$ using the velocity-fluctuation fields at $y^{+} = 100$ as input with less than 20% error in prediction of streamwise-fluctuations intensity. These results are an encouraging starting point to develop a neural-network based approach for modelling turbulence at the wall in numerical simulations.