Robert Östling

Robert Östling, Murathan Kurfalı

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been shown to contain biases in the process of integrating conflicting information when answering questions. Here we ask whether such biases also exist with respect to which language is used for each conflicting piece of information. To answer this question, we extend the conflicting needles in a haystack paradigm to a multilingual setting and perform a comprehensive set of evaluations with naturalistic news domain data in five different languages, for a range of multilingual LLMs of different sizes. We find that all LLMs tested, including GPT-5.2, ignore the conflict and confidently assert only one of the possible answers in the large majority of cases. Furthermore, there is a consistent bias across models in which languages are preferred, with a general bias against Russian and, for the longest context lengths, in favor of Chinese. Both of these patterns are consistent between models trained inside and outside of mainland China, though somewhat stronger in the former category.

Johan Sjons, Thomas Hörberg, Robert Östling et al.

In earlier work, we have shown that articulation rate in Swedish child-directed speech (CDS) increases as a function of the age of the child, even when utterance length and differences in articulation rate between subjects are controlled for. In this paper we show on utterance level in spontaneous Swedish speech that i) for the youngest children, articulation rate in CDS is lower than in adult-directed speech (ADS), ii) there is a significant negative correlation between articulation rate and surprisal (the negative log probability) in ADS, and iii) the increase in articulation rate in Swedish CDS as a function of the age of the child holds, even when surprisal along with utterance length and differences in articulation rate between speakers are controlled for. These results indicate that adults adjust their articulation rate to make it fit the linguistic capacity of the child.