Rajat Singh

Rajat Singh, Srikanta Bedathur

Tabular data comprising rows (samples) with the same set of columns (attributes, is one of the most widely used data-type among various industries, including financial services, health care, research, retail, and logistics, to name a few. Tables are becoming the natural way of storing data among various industries and academia. The data stored in these tables serve as an essential source of information for making various decisions. As computational power and internet connectivity increase, the data stored by these companies grow exponentially, and not only do the databases become vast and challenging to maintain and operate, but the quantity of database tasks also increases. Thus a new line of research work has been started, which applies various learning techniques to support various database tasks for such large and complex tables. In this work, we split the quest of learning on tabular data into two phases: The Classical Learning Phase and The Modern Machine Learning Phase. The classical learning phase consists of the models such as SVMs, linear and logistic regression, and tree-based methods. These models are best suited for small-size tables. However, the number of tasks these models can address is limited to classification and regression. In contrast, the Modern Machine Learning Phase contains models that use deep learning for learning latent space representation of table entities. The objective of this survey is to scrutinize the varied approaches used by practitioners to learn representation for the structured data, and to compare their efficacy.

Rajat Singh, Srikanta Bedathur

Equivalence checking of SQL queries is an intractable problem often encountered in settings ranging from grading SQL submissions to debugging query optimizers. Despite recent work toward developing practical solutions, only simple queries written using a small subset of SQL are supported, leaving the equivalence checking of sophisticated SQL queries at the mercy of intensive, potentially error-prone, manual analysis. In this paper, we explore how LLMs can be used to reason with SQL queries to address this challenging problem. Towards this, we introduce a novel, realistic, and sufficiently complex benchmark called SQLEquiQuest for SQL query equivalence checking that reflects real-world settings. We establish strong baselines for SQL equivalence checking by leveraging the ability of LLMs to reason with SQL queries. We conduct a detailed evaluation of several state-of-the-art LLMs using various prompting strategies and carefully constructed in-context learning examples, including logical plans generated by SQL query processors. Our empirical evaluation shows that LLMs go well beyond the current capabilities of formal models for SQL equivalence, going from a mere 30% supported query pairs to full coverage, achieving up to 82% accuracy on Spider+DIN. However, a critical limitation of LLMs revealed by our analysis is that they exhibit a strong bias for equivalence predictions, with consistently poor performance over non-equivalent pairs, opening a new direction for potential future research.

Nurendra Choudhary, Rajat Singh, Ishita Bindlish et al.

Text articles with false claims, especially news, have recently become aggravating for the Internet users. These articles are in wide circulation and readers face difficulty discerning fact from fiction. Previous work on credibility assessment has focused on factual analysis and linguistic features. The task's main challenge is the distinction between the features of true and false articles. In this paper, we propose a novel approach called Credibility Outcome (CREDO) which aims at scoring the credibility of an article in an open domain setting. CREDO consists of different modules for capturing various features responsible for the credibility of an article. These features includes credibility of the article's source and author, semantic similarity between the article and related credible articles retrieved from a knowledge base, and sentiments conveyed by the article. A neural network architecture learns the contribution of each of these modules to the overall credibility of an article. Experiments on Snopes dataset reveals that CREDO outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches based on linguistic features.