Daniel Q. Huang

LG
h-index54
4papers
5citations
Novelty45%
AI Score42

4 Papers

3.8LGOct 2, 2023Code
On Training Derivative-Constrained Neural Networks

KaiChieh Lo, Daniel Huang

We refer to the setting where the (partial) derivatives of a neural network's (NN's) predictions with respect to its inputs are used as additional training signal as a derivative-constrained (DC) NN. This situation is common in physics-informed settings in the natural sciences. We propose an integrated RELU (IReLU) activation function to improve training of DC NNs. We also investigate denormalization and label rescaling to help stabilize DC training. We evaluate our methods on physics-informed settings including quantum chemistry and Scientific Machine Learning (SciML) tasks. We demonstrate that existing architectures with IReLU activations combined with denormalization and label rescaling better incorporate training signal provided by derivative constraints.

2.0LGJun 10, 2023Code
Push: Concurrent Probabilistic Programming for Bayesian Deep Learning

Daniel Huang, Chris Camaño, Jonathan Tsegaye et al.

We introduce a library called Push that takes a probabilistic programming approach to Bayesian deep learning (BDL). This library enables concurrent execution of BDL inference algorithms on multi-GPU hardware for neural network (NN) models. To accomplish this, Push introduces an abstraction that represents an input NN as a particle. Push enables easy creation of particles so that an input NN can be replicated and particles can communicate asynchronously so that a variety of parameter updates can be expressed, including common BDL algorithms. Our hope is that Push lowers the barrier to experimenting with BDL by streamlining the scaling of particles across GPUs. We evaluate the scaling behavior of particles on single-node multi-GPU devices on vision and scientific machine learning (SciML) tasks.

5.5MLOct 28, 2024Code
High-Dimensional Gaussian Process Regression with Soft Kernel Interpolation

Chris Camaño, Daniel Huang

We introduce Soft Kernel Interpolation (SoftKI), a method that combines aspects of Structured Kernel Interpolation (SKI) and variational inducing point methods, to achieve scalable Gaussian Process (GP) regression on high-dimensional datasets. SoftKI approximates a kernel via softmax interpolation from a smaller number of interpolation points learned by optimizing a combination of the SoftKI marginal log-likelihood (MLL), and when needed, an approximate MLL for improved numerical stability. Consequently, it can overcome the dimensionality scaling challenges that SKI faces when interpolating from a dense and static lattice while retaining the flexibility of variational methods to adapt inducing points to the dataset. We demonstrate the effectiveness of SoftKI across various examples and show that it is competitive with other approximated GP methods when the data dimensionality is modest (around 10).

5.8AIOct 9, 2025
What Is Your Agent's GPA? A Framework for Evaluating Agent Goal-Plan-Action Alignment

Allison Sihan Jia, Daniel Huang, Nikhil Vytla et al.

We introduce the Agent GPA (Goal-Plan-Action) framework: an evaluation paradigm based on an agent's operational loop of setting goals, devising plans, and executing actions. The framework includes five evaluation metrics: Goal Fulfillment, Logical Consistency, Execution Efficiency, Plan Quality, and Plan Adherence. Logical Consistency checks that an agent's actions are consistent with its prior actions. Execution Efficiency checks whether the agent executes in the most efficient way to achieve its goal. Plan Quality checks whether an agent's plans are aligned with its goals; Plan Adherence checks if an agent's actions are aligned with its plan; and Goal Fulfillment checks that agent's final outcomes match the stated goals. Our experimental results on two benchmark datasets - the public TRAIL/GAIA dataset and an internal dataset for a production-grade data agent - show that this framework (a) provides a systematic way to cover a broad range of agent failures, including all agent errors on the TRAIL/GAIA benchmark dataset; (b) supports LLM-judges that exhibit strong agreement with human annotation, covering 80% to over 95% errors; and (c) localizes errors with 86% agreement to enable targeted improvement of agent performance.