Alexander Ng

Weixi Yi, Yipei Wang, Natasha Thorley et al.

Current imaging-based prostate cancer diagnosis requires both MR T2-weighted (T2w) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences, with additional sequences for potentially greater accuracy improvement. However, measuring diffusion patterns in DWI sequences can be time-consuming, prone to artifacts and sensitive to imaging parameters. While machine learning (ML) models have demonstrated radiologist-level accuracy in detecting prostate cancer from these two sequences, this study investigates the potential of ML-enabled methods using only the T2w sequence as input during inference time. We first discuss the technical feasibility of such a T2-only approach, and then propose a novel ML formulation, where DWI sequences - readily available for training purposes - are only used to train a meta-learning model, which subsequently only uses T2w sequences at inference. Using multiple datasets from more than 3,000 prostate cancer patients, we report superior or comparable performance in localising radiologist-identified prostate cancer using our proposed T2-only models, compared with alternative models using T2-only or both sequences as input. Real patient cases are presented and discussed to demonstrate, for the first time, the exclusively true-positive cases from models with different input sequences.

Yucheng Tang, Pawel Rajwa, Alexander Ng et al.

Foundation models in medical imaging have shown promising label efficiency, achieving high performance on downstream tasks using only a fraction of the annotated data otherwise required. In this study, we evaluate this potential in the context of prostate multiparametric MRI using ProFound, a recently developed domain-specific vision foundation model pretrained on large-scale prostate MRI datasets. We investigate the impact of variable image quality on the label-efficient finetuning, by quantifying the generalisability of the finetuned models. We conduct a comprehensive set of experiments by systematically varying the ratios of high- and low-quality images in the finetuning and evaluation sets. Our findings indicate that image quality distribution and its finetune-and-test mismatch significantly affect model performance. In particular: a) Varying the ratio of high- to low-quality images between finetuning and test sets leads to notable differences in downstream performance; and b) The presence of sufficient high-quality images in the finetuning set is critical for maintaining strong performance, whilst the importance of matched finetuning and testing distribution varies between different downstream tasks, such as automated radiology reporting and prostate cancer detection. Importantly, experimental results also show that, although finetuning requires significantly less labeled data compared to training from scratch when the quality ratio is consistent, this label efficiency is not independent of the image quality distribution. For example, we show cases that, without sufficient high-quality images in finetuning, finetuned models may fail to outperform those without pretraining.