Shourav B. Rabbani

Shourav B. Rabbani, Manar D. Samad

Traditional machine learning assumes samples in tabular data to be independent and identically distributed (i.i.d). This assumption may miss useful information within and between sample relationships in representation learning. This paper relaxes the i.i.d assumption to learn tabular data representations by incorporating between-sample relationships for the first time using graph neural networks (GNN). We investigate our hypothesis using several GNNs and state-of-the-art (SOTA) deep attention models to learn the between-sample relationship on ten tabular data sets by comparing them to traditional machine learning methods. GNN methods show the best performance on tabular data with large feature-to-sample ratios. Our results reveal that attention-based GNN methods outperform traditional machine learning on five data sets and SOTA deep tabular learning methods on three data sets. Between-sample learning via GNN and deep attention methods yield the best classification accuracy on seven of the ten data sets. This suggests that the i.i.d assumption may not always hold for most tabular data sets.

Shourav B. Rabbani, Ivan V. Medri, Manar D. Samad

Despite groundbreaking success in image and text learning, deep learning has not achieved significant improvements against traditional machine learning (ML) when it comes to tabular data. This performance gap underscores the need for data-centric treatment and benchmarking of learning algorithms. Recently, attention and contrastive learning breakthroughs have shifted computer vision and natural language processing paradigms. However, the effectiveness of these advanced deep models on tabular data is sparsely studied using a few data sets with very large sample sizes, reporting mixed findings after benchmarking against a limited number of baselines. We argue that the heterogeneity of tabular data sets and selective baselines in the literature can bias the benchmarking outcomes. This article extensively evaluates state-of-the-art attention and contrastive learning methods on a wide selection of 28 tabular data sets (14 easy and 14 hard-to-classify) against traditional deep and machine learning. Our data-centric benchmarking demonstrates when traditional ML is preferred over deep learning and vice versa because no best learning method exists for all tabular data sets. Combining between-sample and between-feature attentions conquers the invincible traditional ML on tabular data sets by a significant margin but fails on high dimensional data, where contrastive learning takes a robust lead. While a hybrid attention-contrastive learning strategy mostly wins on hard-to-classify data sets, traditional methods are frequently superior on easy-to-classify data sets with presumably simpler decision boundaries. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first benchmarking paper with statistical analyses of attention and contrastive learning performances on a diverse selection of tabular data sets against traditional deep and machine learning baselines to facilitate further advances in this field.

Ibna Kowsar, Shourav B. Rabbani, Yina Hou et al.

Missing values of varying patterns and rates in real-world tabular data pose a significant challenge in developing reliable data-driven models. The most commonly used statistical and machine learning methods for missing value imputation may be ineffective when the missing rate is high and not random. This paper explores row and column attention in tabular data as between-feature and between-sample attention in a novel framework to reconstruct missing values. The proposed method uses CutMix data augmentation within a contrastive learning framework to improve the uncertainty of missing value estimation. The performance and generalizability of trained imputation models are evaluated in set-aside test data folds with missing values. The proposed framework is compared with 11 state-of-the-art statistical, machine learning, and deep imputation methods using 12 diverse tabular data sets. The average performance rank of our proposed method demonstrates its superiority over the state-of-the-art methods for missing rates between 10% and 90% and three missing value types, especially when the missing values are not random. The quality of the imputed data using our proposed method is compared in a downstream patient classification task using real-world electronic health records. This paper highlights the heterogeneity of tabular data sets to recommend imputation methods based on missing value types and data characteristics.

Yina Hou, Shourav B. Rabbani, Liang Hong et al.

The importance of clinical variables in the prognosis of the disease is explained using statistical correlation or machine learning (ML). However, the predictive importance of these variables may not represent their causal relationships with diseases. This paper uses clinical variables from a heart failure (HF) patient cohort to investigate the causal explainability of important variables obtained in statistical and ML contexts. Due to inherent regression modeling, popular causal discovery methods strictly assume that the cause and effect variables are numerical and continuous. This paper proposes a new computational framework to enable causal structure discovery (CSD) and score the causal strength of mixed-type (categorical, numerical, binary) clinical variables for binary disease outcomes. In HF classification, we investigate the association between the importance rank order of three feature types: correlated features, features important for ML predictions, and causal features. Our results demonstrate that CSD modeling for nonlinear causal relationships is more meaningful than its linear counterparts. Feature importance obtained from nonlinear classifiers (e.g., gradient-boosting trees) strongly correlates with the causal strength of variables without differentiating cause and effect variables. Correlated variables can be causal for HF, but they are rarely identified as effect variables. These results can be used to add the causal explanation of variables important for ML-based prediction modeling.