Jonas G. Matt

Jonas G. Matt, Lukas Ortmann, Saverio Bolognani et al.

When high amounts of active power are injected into power distribution grids, the overall power flow is limited because voltages reach their upper acceptable limits. Volt/var control aims to raise this power flow limit without physically reinforcing the grid but by controlling the voltage using reactive power. We use real consumption and generation data on a low-voltage CIGRÉ grid model and an experiment on a real distribution grid feeder to analyze how different volt/var methods can enhance the grid. We show that local droop control enhances the grid but underutilizes the reactive power resources. We discuss how this inefficiency can be partly reduced by fine-tuning the droop curves through data-driven techniques but illustrate that inherent trade-off persist for any local control method. We finally demonstrate that coordinated control methods can track the optimal solution and enhance the grid to its full potential if grid-wide communication is available. Our numerical study over a whole year of real data suggests that coordinated volt/var control can enable another 10.4% of maximum active power injections compared to droop control. In a small-scale real-life experiment, coordinated control enhanced the grid by the same amount.

Jonas G. Matt, Ilia Shilov, Saverio Bolognani

This paper presents a welfarist approach to fair active power curtailment in distribution grids with distributed photovoltaics. We address the lack of consistent axiomatic foundations in existing ad-hoc curtailment rules by modeling the decision as a social choice problem over feasible operating points and by deriving curtailment objectives from a set of foundational axioms that express principled stances on fairness and grid access rights. Rather than relying on the typically assumed full comparability of utilities, which can lead to undesirable outcomes in heterogeneous residential systems, we adopt a cardinal non-comparability stance on utilities. This approach requires far fewer assumptions about prosumers' private preferences while providing a rigorous basis for fair social ranking. We then present a unified framework that demonstrates that existing curtailment schemes represent specific instances of the Kalai-Smorodinsky rule applied to different normative reference points. This perspective offers grid operators an auditable, axiomatic foundation for justifying fairness in local energy systems.