Ferdi Kossmann

Ferdinand Kossmann, Ziniu Wu, Eugenie Lai et al.

Social media, self-driving cars, and traffic cameras produce video streams at large scales and cheap cost. However, storing and querying video at such scales is prohibitively expensive. We propose to treat large-scale video analytics as a data warehousing problem: Video is a format that is easy to produce but needs to be transformed into an application-specific format that is easy to query. Analogously, we define the problem of Video Extract-Transform-Load (V-ETL). V-ETL systems need to reduce the cost of running a user-defined V-ETL job while also giving throughput guarantees to keep up with the rate at which data is produced. We find that no current system sufficiently fulfills both needs and therefore propose Skyscraper, a system tailored to V-ETL. Skyscraper can execute arbitrary video ingestion pipelines and adaptively tunes them to reduce cost at minimal or no quality degradation, e.g., by adjusting sampling rates and resolutions to the ingested content. Skyscraper can hereby be provisioned with cheap on-premises compute and uses a combination of buffering and cloud bursting to deal with peaks in workload caused by expensive processing configurations. In our experiments, we find that Skyscraper significantly reduces the cost of V-ETL ingestion compared to adaptions of current SOTA systems, while at the same time giving robustness guarantees that these systems are lacking.

Ferdi Kossmann, Bruce Fontaine, Daya Khudia et al.

Serving systems for Large Language Models (LLMs) improve throughput by processing several requests concurrently. However, multiplexing hardware resources between concurrent requests involves non-trivial scheduling decisions. Practical serving systems typically implement these decisions at two levels: First, a load balancer routes requests to different servers which each hold a replica of the LLM. Then, on each server, an engine-level scheduler decides when to run a request, or when to queue or preempt it. Improved scheduling policies may benefit a wide range of LLM deployments and can often be implemented as "drop-in replacements" to a system's current policy. In this work, we survey scheduling techniques from the literature and from practical serving systems. We find that schedulers from the literature often achieve good performance but introduce significant complexity. In contrast, schedulers in practical deployments often leave easy performance gains on the table but are easy to implement, deploy and configure. This finding motivates us to introduce two new scheduling techniques, which are both easy to implement, and outperform current techniques on production workload traces.

Ferdi Kossmann, Ziniu Wu, Alex Turk et al.

Machine learning (ML) models are increasingly deployed to production, calling for efficient inference serving systems. Efficient inference serving is complicated by two challenges: (i) ML models incur high computational costs, and (ii) the request arrival rates of practical applications have frequent, high, and sudden variations which make it hard to correctly provision hardware. Model cascades are positioned to tackle both of these challenges, as they (i) save work while maintaining accuracy, and (ii) expose a high-resolution trade-off between work and accuracy, allowing for fine-grained adjustments to request arrival rates. Despite their potential, model cascades haven't been used inside an online serving system. This comes with its own set of challenges, including workload adaption, model replication onto hardware, inference scheduling, request batching, and more. In this work, we propose CascadeServe, which automates and optimizes end-to-end inference serving with cascades. CascadeServe operates in an offline and online phase. In the offline phase, the system pre-computes a gear plan that specifies how to serve inferences online. In the online phase, the gear plan allows the system to serve inferences while making near-optimal adaptations to the query load at negligible decision overheads. We find that CascadeServe saves 2-3x in cost across a wide spectrum of the latency-accuracy space when compared to state-of-the-art baselines on different workloads.