Lutfu Sua

LG
h-index1
3papers
3citations
Novelty20%
AI Score18

3 Papers

1.2QUANT-PHJul 26, 2024
Hybrid Heuristic Algorithms for Adiabatic Quantum Machine Learning Models

Bahram Alidaee, Haibo Wang, Lutfu Sua et al.

Numerous established machine learning models and various neural network architectures can be restructured as Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problems. A significant challenge in Adiabatic Quantum Machine Learning (AQML) is the computational demand of the training phase. To mitigate this, approximation techniques inspired by quantum annealing, like Simulated Annealing and Multiple Start Tabu Search (MSTS), have been employed to expedite QUBO-based AQML training. This paper introduces a novel hybrid algorithm that incorporates an "r-flip" strategy. This strategy is aimed at solving large-scale QUBO problems more effectively, offering better solution quality and lower computational costs compared to existing MSTS methods. The r-flip approach has practical applications in diverse fields, including cross-docking, supply chain management, machine scheduling, and fraud detection. The paper details extensive computational experiments comparing this r-flip enhanced hybrid heuristic against a standard MSTS approach. These tests utilize both standard benchmark problems and three particularly large QUBO instances. The results indicate that the r-flip enhanced method consistently produces high-quality solutions efficiently, operating within practical time constraints.

7.1LGMay 6, 2025
Deep Learning in Renewable Energy Forecasting: A Cross-Dataset Evaluation of Temporal and Spatial Models

Lutfu Sua, Haibo Wang, Jun Huang

Unpredictability of renewable energy sources coupled with the complexity of those methods used for various purposes in this area calls for the development of robust methods such as DL models within the renewable energy domain. Given the nonlinear relationships among variables in renewable energy datasets, DL models are preferred over traditional machine learning (ML) models because they can effectively capture and model complex interactions between variables. This research aims to identify the factors responsible for the accuracy of DL techniques, such as sampling, stationarity, linearity, and hyperparameter optimization for different algorithms. The proposed DL framework compares various methods and alternative training/test ratios. Seven ML methods, such as Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM), Stacked LSTM, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), CNN-LSTM, Deep Neural Network (DNN), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Encoder-Decoder (ED), were evaluated on two different datasets. The first dataset contains the weather and power generation data. It encompasses two distinct datasets, hourly energy demand data and hourly weather data in Spain, while the second dataset includes power output generated by the photovoltaic panels at 12 locations. This study deploys regularization approaches, including early stopping, neuron dropping, and L2 regularization, to reduce the overfitting problem associated with DL models. The LSTM and MLP models show superior performance. Their validation data exhibit exceptionally low root mean square error values.

4.1LGJan 27, 2025
Renewable Energy Prediction: A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Models for Complex Dataset Analysis

Haibo Wang, Jun Huang, Lutfu Sua et al.

The increasing focus on predicting renewable energy production aligns with advancements in deep learning (DL). The inherent variability of renewable sources and the complexity of prediction methods require robust approaches, such as DL models, in the renewable energy sector. DL models are preferred over traditional machine learning (ML) because they capture complex, nonlinear relationships in renewable energy datasets. This study examines key factors influencing DL technique accuracy, including sampling and hyperparameter optimization, by comparing various methods and training and test ratios within a DL framework. Seven machine learning methods, LSTM, Stacked LSTM, CNN, CNN-LSTM, DNN, Time-Distributed MLP (TD-MLP), and Autoencoder (AE), are evaluated using a dataset combining weather and photovoltaic power output data from 12 locations. Regularization techniques such as early stopping, neuron dropout, L1 and L2 regularization are applied to address overfitting. The results demonstrate that the combination of early stopping, dropout, and L1 regularization provides the best performance to reduce overfitting in the CNN and TD-MLP models with larger training set, while the combination of early stopping, dropout, and L2 regularization is the most effective to reduce the overfitting in CNN-LSTM and AE models with smaller training set.