Jannis Chemseddine

LG
h-index1
5papers
75citations
Novelty57%
AI Score42

5 Papers

20.2MLOct 4, 2023Code
Posterior Sampling Based on Gradient Flows of the MMD with Negative Distance Kernel

Paul Hagemann, Johannes Hertrich, Fabian Altekrüger et al.

We propose conditional flows of the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) with the negative distance kernel for posterior sampling and conditional generative modeling. This MMD, which is also known as energy distance, has several advantageous properties like efficient computation via slicing and sorting. We approximate the joint distribution of the ground truth and the observations using discrete Wasserstein gradient flows and establish an error bound for the posterior distributions. Further, we prove that our particle flow is indeed a Wasserstein gradient flow of an appropriate functional. The power of our method is demonstrated by numerical examples including conditional image generation and inverse problems like superresolution, inpainting and computed tomography in low-dose and limited-angle settings.

6.6LGOct 20, 2023
Y-Diagonal Couplings: Approximating Posteriors with Conditional Wasserstein Distances

Jannis Chemseddine, Paul Hagemann, Christian Wald

In inverse problems, many conditional generative models approximate the posterior measure by minimizing a distance between the joint measure and its learned approximation. While this approach also controls the distance between the posterior measures in the case of the Kullback Leibler divergence, it does not hold true for the Wasserstein distance. We will introduce a conditional Wasserstein distance with a set of restricted couplings that equals the expected Wasserstein distance of the posteriors. By deriving its dual, we find a rigorous way to motivate the loss of conditional Wasserstein GANs. We outline conditions under which the vanilla and the conditional Wasserstein distance coincide. Furthermore, we will show numerical examples where training with the conditional Wasserstein distance yields favorable properties for posterior sampling.

21.6LGMar 27, 2024Code
Conditional Wasserstein Distances with Applications in Bayesian OT Flow Matching

Jannis Chemseddine, Paul Hagemann, Gabriele Steidl et al.

In inverse problems, many conditional generative models approximate the posterior measure by minimizing a distance between the joint measure and its learned approximation. While this approach also controls the distance between the posterior measures in the case of the Kullback--Leibler divergence, this is in general not hold true for the Wasserstein distance. In this paper, we introduce a conditional Wasserstein distance via a set of restricted couplings that equals the expected Wasserstein distance of the posteriors. Interestingly, the dual formulation of the conditional Wasserstein-1 flow resembles losses in the conditional Wasserstein GAN literature in a quite natural way. We derive theoretical properties of the conditional Wasserstein distance, characterize the corresponding geodesics and velocity fields as well as the flow ODEs. Subsequently, we propose to approximate the velocity fields by relaxing the conditional Wasserstein distance. Based on this, we propose an extension of OT Flow Matching for solving Bayesian inverse problems and demonstrate its numerical advantages on an inverse problem and class-conditional image generation.

7.8MLOct 14, 2025
Adapting Noise to Data: Generative Flows from 1D Processes

Jannis Chemseddine, Gregor Kornhardt, Richard Duong et al.

We introduce a general framework for constructing generative models using one-dimensional noising processes. Beyond diffusion processes, we outline examples that demonstrate the flexibility of our approach. Motivated by this, we propose a novel framework in which the 1D processes themselves are learnable, achieved by parameterizing the noise distribution through quantile functions that adapt to the data. Our construction integrates seamlessly with standard objectives, including Flow Matching and consistency models. Learning quantile-based noise naturally captures heavy tails and compact supports when present. Numerical experiments highlight both the flexibility and the effectiveness of our method.

3.3NAMay 29, 2025
Trajectory Generator Matching for Time Series

T. Jahn, J. Chemseddine, P. Hagemann et al.

Accurately modeling time-continuous stochastic processes from irregular observations remains a significant challenge. In this paper, we leverage ideas from generative modeling of image data to push the boundary of time series generation. For this, we find new generators of SDEs and jump processes, inspired by trajectory flow matching, that have the marginal distributions of the time series of interest. Specifically, we can handle discontinuities of the underlying processes by parameterizing the jump kernel densities by scaled Gaussians that allow for closed form formulas of the corresponding Kullback-Leibler divergence in the loss. Unlike most other approaches, we are able to handle irregularly sampled time series.