Mahmoud Ibrahim

Mahmoud Ibrahim, Bart Elen, Chang Sun et al.

Generative models are increasingly used to augment medical imaging datasets for fairer AI. Yet a key assumption often goes unexamined: that generators themselves produce equally high-quality images across demographic groups. Models trained on imbalanced data can inherit these imbalances, yielding degraded synthesis quality for rare subgroups and struggling with demographic intersections absent from training. We refer to this as the imbalanced generator problem. Existing remedies such as loss reweighting operate at the optimization level and provide limited benefit when training signal is scarce or absent for certain combinations. We propose CompDiff, a hierarchical compositional diffusion framework that addresses this problem at the representation level. A dedicated Hierarchical Conditioner Network (HCN) decomposes demographic conditioning, producing a demographic token concatenated with CLIP embeddings as cross-attention context. This structured factorization encourages parameter sharing across subgroups and supports compositional generalization to rare or unseen demographic intersections. Experiments on chest X-rays (MIMIC-CXR) and fundus images (FairGenMed) show that CompDiff compares favorably against both standard fine-tuning and FairDiffusion across image quality (FID: 64.3 vs. 75.1), subgroup equity (ES-FID), and zero-shot intersectional generalization (up to 21% FID improvement on held-out intersections). Downstream classifiers trained on CompDiff-generated data also show improved AUROC and reduced demographic bias, suggesting that architectural design of demographic conditioning is an important and underexplored factor in fair medical image generation. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/CompDiff-6FE6.

Mahmoud Ibrahim, Bart Elen, Chang Sun et al.

We present a novel framework for leveraging synthetic ICU time-series data not only to train but also to rigorously and trustworthily evaluate predictive models, both at the population level and within fine-grained demographic subgroups. Building on prior diffusion and VAE-based generators (TimeDiff, HealthGen, TimeAutoDiff), we introduce \textit{Enhanced TimeAutoDiff}, which augments the latent diffusion objective with distribution-alignment penalties. We extensively benchmark all models on MIMIC-III and eICU, on 24-hour mortality and binary length-of-stay tasks. Our results show that Enhanced TimeAutoDiff reduces the gap between real-on-synthetic and real-on-real evaluation (``TRTS gap'') by over 70\%, achieving $Δ_{TRTS} \leq 0.014$ AUROC, while preserving training utility ($Δ_{TSTR} \approx 0.01$). Crucially, for 32 intersectional subgroups, large synthetic cohorts cut subgroup-level AUROC estimation error by up to 50\% relative to small real test sets, and outperform them in 72--84\% of subgroups. This work provides a practical, privacy-preserving roadmap for trustworthy, granular model evaluation in critical care, enabling robust and reliable performance analysis across diverse patient populations without exposing sensitive EHR data, contributing to the overall trustworthiness of Medical AI.

Mahmoud Ibrahim, Yasmina Al Khalil, Sina Amirrajab et al.

This paper presents a comprehensive systematic review of generative models (GANs, VAEs, DMs, and LLMs) used to synthesize various medical data types, including imaging (dermoscopic, mammographic, ultrasound, CT, MRI, and X-ray), text, time-series, and tabular data (EHR). Unlike previous narrowly focused reviews, our study encompasses a broad array of medical data modalities and explores various generative models. Our search strategy queries databases such as Scopus, PubMed, and ArXiv, focusing on recent works from January 2021 to November 2023, excluding reviews and perspectives. This period emphasizes recent advancements beyond GANs, which have been extensively covered previously. The survey reveals insights from three key aspects: (1) Synthesis applications and purpose of synthesis, (2) generation techniques, and (3) evaluation methods. It highlights clinically valid synthesis applications, demonstrating the potential of synthetic data to tackle diverse clinical requirements. While conditional models incorporating class labels, segmentation masks and image translations are prevalent, there is a gap in utilizing prior clinical knowledge and patient-specific context, suggesting a need for more personalized synthesis approaches and emphasizing the importance of tailoring generative approaches to the unique characteristics of medical data. Additionally, there is a significant gap in using synthetic data beyond augmentation, such as for validation and evaluation of downstream medical AI models. The survey uncovers that the lack of standardized evaluation methodologies tailored to medical images is a barrier to clinical application, underscoring the need for in-depth evaluation approaches, benchmarking, and comparative studies to promote openness and collaboration.