Viswonathan Manoranjan

Viswonathan Manoranjan, Snehalkumar `Neil' S. Gaikwad

Large language models are increasingly deployed in multi-agent systems for strategic tasks, yet how design choices such as role-based personas and payoff visibility affect behavior remains poorly understood. We investigate whether LLM agents function as payoff-sensitive strategic actors or as identity-driven role followers. Using a 2x2 factorial experiment (persona presence x payoff visibility) with four models (Qwen-7B/32B, Llama-8B, Mistral-7B), we test 53 environmental policy scenarios in four-agent strategic games. We find that personas suppress payoff-aligned behavior: with personas present, all models achieve near-zero Nash equilibrium in Tragedy-dominant scenarios despite complete payoff information. Nearly every equilibrium reached is Green Transition. Removing personas and providing explicit payoffs are both near-necessary for payoff-aligned behavior, enabling only Qwen models to reach 65--90\% equilibrium rates. Our results reveal three behavioral profiles: Qwen adapts to framing, Mistral is disrupted without finding Tragedy equilibrium, and Llama remains near-invariant. We show that the same binary design choice can shift equilibrium attainment by up to 90 percentage points, establishing that representational choices are not implementation details but governance decisions.

Viswonathan Manoranjan, Amogh Gupta, Anvesh Rao Vijjini et al.

Large language models often struggle with sensitive prompts. They may refuse outright, provide generic safety boilerplate, or fail to address the user's legitimate informational needs that can be answered safely. We introduce SHARD, a self-reframing distillation method to improve safe-helpfulness. It first rewrites sensitive prompts to surface benign intent using philosophical guidelines, then reframes its original responses into safe, more helpful ones, and finally fine-tunes the model on its self-reframed responses. Across DNA and the English subset of LINGUASAFE, SHARD improves helpfulness for most model families while preserving safety. It also remains competitive with distillation from a larger teacher model, suggesting that models can internalize safe and helpful behavior elicited from their own. Warning: This paper contains content that may be offensive or harmful.