Fabio Santos

Gabriel Aracena, Kyle Luster, Fabio Santos et al.

Effective prioritization of issue reports is crucial in software engineering to optimize resource allocation and address critical problems promptly. However, the manual classification of issue reports for prioritization is laborious and lacks scalability. Alternatively, many open source software (OSS) projects employ automated processes for this task, albeit relying on substantial datasets for adequate training. This research seeks to devise an automated approach that ensures reliability in issue prioritization, even when trained on smaller datasets. Our proposed methodology harnesses the power of Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPT), recognizing their potential to efficiently handle this task. By leveraging the capabilities of such models, we aim to develop a robust system for prioritizing issue reports accurately, mitigating the necessity for extensive training data while maintaining reliability. In our research, we have developed a reliable GPT-based approach to accurately label and prioritize issue reports with a reduced training dataset. By reducing reliance on massive data requirements and focusing on few-shot fine-tuning, our methodology offers a more accessible and efficient solution for issue prioritization in software engineering. Our model predicted issue types in individual projects up to 93.2% in precision, 95% in recall, and 89.3% in F1-score.

Gabriel Aracena, Kyle Luster, Fabio Santos et al.

Effective prioritization of issue reports in software engineering helps to optimize resource allocation and information recovery. However, manual issue classification is laborious and lacks scalability. As an alternative, many open source software (OSS) projects employ automated processes for this task, yet this method often relies on large datasets for adequate training. Traditionally, machine learning techniques have been used for issue classification. More recently, large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for addressing a range of software engineering challenges, including code and test generation, mapping new requirements to legacy software endpoints, and conducting code reviews. The following research investigates an automated approach to issue classification based on LLMs. By leveraging the capabilities of such models, we aim to develop a robust system for prioritizing issue reports, mitigating the necessity for extensive training data while also maintaining reliability in classification. In our research, we developed an LLM-based approach for accurately labeling issues by selecting two of the most prominent large language models. We then compared their performance across multiple datasets. Our findings show that GPT-4o achieved the best results in classifying issues from the NLBSE 2024 competition. Moreover, GPT-4o outperformed DeepSeek R1, achieving an F1 score 20% higher when both models were trained on the same dataset from the NLBSE 2023 competition, which was ten times larger than the NLBSE 2024 dataset. The fine-tuned GPT-4o model attained an average F1 score of 80.7%, while the fine-tuned DeepSeek R1 model achieved 59.33%. Increasing the dataset size did not improve the F1 score, reducing the dependence on massive datasets for building an efficient solution to issue classification.

Fabio Santos, Igor Wiese, Bianca Trinkenreich et al.

Open Source Software projects add labels to open issues to help contributors choose tasks. However, manually labeling issues is time-consuming and error-prone. Current automatic approaches for creating labels are mostly limited to classifying issues as a bug/non-bug. In this paper, we investigate the feasibility and relevance of labeling issues with the domain of the APIs required to complete the tasks. We leverage the issues' description and the project history to build prediction models, which resulted in precision up to 82% and recall up to 97.8%. We also ran a user study (n=74) to assess these labels' relevancy to potential contributors. The results show that the labels were useful to participants in choosing tasks, and the API-domain labels were selected more often than the existing architecture-based labels. Our results can inspire the creation of tools to automatically label issues, helping developers to find tasks that better match their skills.