William Regli

Michael Ledford, William Regli

In many multi-agent applications, tasks yield rewards only when executed by a coalition meeting an unknown size threshold; otherwise, feedback is fully censored. This censorship creates an identifiability problem: agents cannot distinguish stochastic failure from insufficient coordination. We formalize this setting as the Threshold-Activated Cooperative Multi-Armed Bandit (TAC-MAB) and analyze it under both centralized and decentralized coordination. We show that a centralized algorithm (C-TAC) achieves cumulative regret O(log T), decomposed into a structural-search term that captures the cost of resolving feasibility under censored feedback and a statistical-monitoring term for value estimation. We then introduce D-TAC, a decentralized event-triggered protocol in which agents synchronize only when their structural beliefs change. Empirically, D-TAC achieves a 23x reduction in communication relative to the centralized baseline while preserving feasibility alignment under conservative belief fusion. These results characterize the coordination cost of learning under censored feedback and show that near-centralized communication efficiency is achievable without continuous synchronization.

Brandon C. Colelough, William Regli

Background: The field of Artificial Intelligence has undergone cyclical periods of growth and decline, known as AI summers and winters. Currently, we are in the third AI summer, characterized by significant advancements and commercialization, particularly in the integration of Symbolic AI and Sub-Symbolic AI, leading to the emergence of Neuro-Symbolic AI. Methods: The review followed the PRISMA methodology, utilizing databases such as IEEE Explore, Google Scholar, arXiv, ACM, and SpringerLink. The inclusion criteria targeted peer-reviewed papers published between 2020 and 2024. Papers were screened for relevance to Neuro-Symbolic AI, with further inclusion based on the availability of associated codebases to ensure reproducibility. Results: From an initial pool of 1,428 papers, 167 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in detail. The majority of research efforts are concentrated in the areas of learning and inference (63%), logic and reasoning (35%), and knowledge representation (44%). Explainability and trustworthiness are less represented (28%), with Meta-Cognition being the least explored area (5%). The review identifies significant interdisciplinary opportunities, particularly in integrating explainability and trustworthiness with other research areas. Conclusion: Neuro-Symbolic AI research has seen rapid growth since 2020, with concentrated efforts in learning and inference. Significant gaps remain in explainability, trustworthiness, and Meta-Cognition. Addressing these gaps through interdisciplinary research will be crucial for advancing the field towards more intelligent, reliable, and context-aware AI systems.

Taylor Paul, William Regli

This work pursues automated planning and scheduling of distributed data pipelines, or workflows. We develop a general workflow and resource graph representation that includes both data processing and sharing components with corresponding network interfaces for scheduling. Leveraging these graphs, we introduce WORKSWORLD, a new domain for numeric domain-independent planners designed for permanently scheduled workflows, like ingest pipelines. Our framework permits users to define data sources, available workflow components, and desired data destinations and formats without explicitly declaring the entire workflow graph as a goal. The planner solves a joint planning and scheduling problem, producing a plan that both builds the workflow graph and schedules its components on the resource graph. We empirically show that a state-of-the-art numeric planner running on commodity hardware with one hour of CPU time and 30GB of memory can solve linear-chain workflows of up to 14 components across eight sites.

Angeline Aguinaldo, Evan Patterson, William Regli

This paper introduces a novel approach to ontology-based robot plan transfer by leveraging functorial data migrations, a structured mapping method derived from category theory. Functors provide structured maps between planning domain ontologies which enables the transfer of task plans without the need for replanning. Unlike methods tailored to specific plans, our framework applies universally within the source domain once a structured map is defined. We demonstrate this approach by transferring a task plan from the canonical Blocksworld domain to one compatible with the AI2-THOR Kitchen environment. Additionally, we discuss practical limitations, propose benchmarks for evaluating symbolic plan transfer methods, and outline future directions for scaling this approach.

Angeline Aguinaldo, Evan Patterson, James Fairbanks et al.

Classical planning representation languages based on first-order logic have preliminarily been used to model and solve robotic task planning problems. Wider adoption of these representation languages, however, is hindered by the limitations present when managing implicit world changes with concise action models. To address this problem, we propose an alternative approach to representing and managing updates to world states during planning. Based on the category-theoretic concepts of $\mathsf{C}$-sets and double-pushout rewriting (DPO), our proposed representation can effectively handle structured knowledge about world states that support domain abstractions at all levels. It formalizes the semantics of predicates according to a user-provided ontology and preserves the semantics when transitioning between world states. This method provides a formal semantics for using knowledge graphs and relational databases to model world states and updates in planning. In this paper, we conceptually compare our category-theoretic representation with the classical planning representation. We show that our proposed representation has advantages over the classical representation in terms of handling implicit preconditions and effects, and provides a more structured framework in which to model and solve planning problems.

Angeline Aguinaldo, William Regli

Classical AI planners provide solutions to planning problems in the form of long and opaque text outputs. To aid in the understanding transferability of planning solutions, it is necessary to have a rich and comprehensible representation for both human and computers beyond the current line-by-line text notation. In particular, it is desirable to encode the trace of literals throughout the plan to capture the dependencies between actions selected. The approach of this paper is to view the actions as maps between literals and the selected plan as a composition of those maps. The mathematical theory, called category theory, provides the relevant structures for capturing maps, their compositions, and maps between compositions. We employ this theory to propose an algorithm agnostic, model-based representation for domains, problems, and plans expressed in the commonly used planning description language, PDDL. This category theoretic representation is accompanied by a graphical syntax in addition to a linear notation, similar to algebraic expressions, that can be used to infer literals used at every step of the plan. This provides the appropriate constructive abstraction and facilitates comprehension for human operators. In this paper, we demonstrate this on a plan within the Blocksworld domain.