Zhixuan You

Zhixuan You, Jihua Zhu, Yiding Sun et al.

3D Gaussian Splatting provides an explicit representation that jointly models geometry and appearance, serving as a scalable foundation for 3D representation learning. Existing pre-training methods for Gaussian representations, such as masked Gaussian reconstruction, primarily capture local structures but offer limited semantic supervision. In this paper, we propose GaussFusion, a multimodal pre-training framework for 3D Gaussian representations. GaussFusion integrates image and text supervision into masked Gaussian modeling through cross-modal semantic alignment, enabling the Gaussian encoder to learn both visual and language-level semantic information during pre-training. To better adapt masked modeling to the non-uniform distribution of Gaussian primitives, we further propose Gaussian Salience-guided Multi-scale Hole Masking (GSHM). GSHM constructs spatially continuous masked regions based on Gaussian salience. By applying hole masks at multiple scales, GSHM encourages the encoder to capture both fine-grained local patterns and broader structural dependencies. Extensive experiments on downstream tasks demonstrate that GaussFusion improves the transferability of Gaussian representations. Notably, GaussFusion outperforms Gaussian-MAE on ModelNet40 and ScanObjectNN (PB-T50-RS) by 0.61\% and 3.85\%, respectively.

Linna Wang, Zhixuan You, Qihui Zhang et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) and causal learning each hold strong potential for clinical decision making (CDM). However, their synergy remains poorly understood, largely due to the lack of systematic benchmarks evaluating their integration in clinical risk prediction. In real-world healthcare, identifying features with causal influence on outcomes is crucial for actionable and trustworthy predictions. While recent work highlights LLMs' emerging causal reasoning abilities, there lacks comprehensive benchmarks to assess their causal learning and performance informed by causal features in clinical risk prediction. To address this, we introduce REACT-LLM, a benchmark designed to evaluate whether combining LLMs with causal features can enhance clinical prognostic performance and potentially outperform traditional machine learning (ML) methods. Unlike existing LLM-clinical benchmarks that often focus on a limited set of outcomes, REACT-LLM evaluates 7 clinical outcomes across 2 real-world datasets, comparing 15 prominent LLMs, 6 traditional ML models, and 3 causal discovery (CD) algorithms. Our findings indicate that while LLMs perform reasonably in clinical prognostics, they have not yet outperformed traditional ML models. Integrating causal features derived from CD algorithms into LLMs offers limited performance gains, primarily due to the strict assumptions of many CD methods, which are often violated in complex clinical data. While the direct integration yields limited improvement, our benchmark reveals a more promising synergy.