Nicholas John Eliopoulos

Huiyun Peng, Arjun Gupte, Ryan Hasler et al.

Automatic software system optimization can improve software speed, reduce operating costs, and save energy. Traditional approaches to optimization rely on manual tuning and compiler heuristics, limiting their ability to generalize across diverse codebases and system contexts. Recent methods using Large Language Models (LLMs) introduce automation on simple programs, but they do not scale effectively to the complexity and size of real-world software systems. We present SysLLMatic, a system that integrates LLMs with performance diagnostics and a curated catalog of 43 optimization patterns to automatically optimize software systems. By leveraging profiling to identify performance hotspots, our approach enables LLMs to optimize real-world software beyond isolated code snippets. We evaluate it on three benchmark suites: HumanEval_CPP (competitive programming in C++), SciMark2 (scientific kernels in Java), and DaCapo (large-scale software systems in Java). Results show that SysLLMatic can improve software system performance, including latency, throughput, energy efficiency, memory usage, and CPU utilization. It consistently outperforms state-of-the-art LLM baselines on microbenchmarks. On large-scale application codes, to which prior LLM approaches have not scaled, it surpasses compiler optimizations, achieving average relative improvements of 1.54x in latency (vs. 1.01x for the compiler) and 1.24x in energy (vs. 1.08x for the compiler). Our findings demonstrate that LLMs, guided by performance knowledge through the optimization pattern catalog and appropriate performance diagnostics, can serve as viable software system optimizers. We further identify limitations of our approach and the challenges involved in handling complex applications. This work provides a foundation for generating optimized code across various languages, benchmarks, and program sizes in a principled manner.

Benjamin Shiue-Hal Chou, Purvish Jajal, Nicholas John Eliopoulos et al.

Beginner musicians often struggle to identify specific errors in their performances, such as playing incorrect notes or rhythms. There are two limitations in existing tools for music error detection: (1) Existing approaches rely on automatic alignment; therefore, they are prone to errors caused by small deviations between alignment targets.; (2) There is a lack of sufficient data to train music error detection models, resulting in over-reliance on heuristics. To address (1), we propose a novel transformer model, Polytune, that takes audio inputs and outputs annotated music scores. This model can be trained end-to-end to implicitly align and compare performance audio with music scores through latent space representations. To address (2), we present a novel data generation technique capable of creating large-scale synthetic music error datasets. Our approach achieves a 64.1% average Error Detection F1 score, improving upon prior work by 40 percentage points across 14 instruments. Additionally, compared with existing transcription methods repurposed for music error detection, our model can handle multiple instruments. Our source code and datasets are available at https://github.com/ben2002chou/Polytune.