Aaditya Baranwal

Aaditya Baranwal, Shruti Vyas

We introduce ChemPro, a progressive benchmark with 4100 natural language question-answer pairs in Chemistry, across 4 coherent sections of difficulty designed to assess the proficiency of Large Language Models (LLMs) in a broad spectrum of general chemistry topics. We include Multiple Choice Questions and Numerical Questions spread across fine-grained information recall, long-horizon reasoning, multi-concept questions, problem-solving with nuanced articulation, and straightforward questions in a balanced ratio, effectively covering Bio-Chemistry, Inorganic-Chemistry, Organic-Chemistry and Physical-Chemistry. ChemPro is carefully designed analogous to a student's academic evaluation for basic to high-school chemistry. A gradual increase in the question difficulty rigorously tests the ability of LLMs to progress from solving basic problems to solving more sophisticated challenges. We evaluate 45+7 state-of-the-art LLMs, spanning both open-source and proprietary variants, and our analysis reveals that while LLMs perform well on basic chemistry questions, their accuracy declines with different types and levels of complexity. These findings highlight the critical limitations of LLMs in general scientific reasoning and understanding and point towards understudied dimensions of difficulty, emphasizing the need for more robust methodologies to improve LLMs.

Aaditya Baranwal, Akshaj Gupta, Shruti Vyas et al.

Every molecule ever synthesised can be drawn as a 2D skeletal diagram, yet in modern property prediction this universally available representation has received less focus in favour of molecular graphs, 3D conformers, or billion-parameter language models, each imposing its own computational and data-engineering overhead. We present $\textbf{MolSight}$, the first systematic large-scale study of vision-based Molecular Property Prediction (MPP). Using 10 vision architectures, 7 pre-training strategies, and $2\,M$ molecule images, we evaluate performance across 10 downstream tasks spanning physical-property regression, drug-discovery classification, and quantum-chemistry prediction. To account for the wide variation in structural complexity across pre-training molecules, we further propose a $\textbf{chemistry-informed curriculum}$: five structural complexity descriptors partition the corpus into five tiers of increasing chemical difficulty, consistently outperforming non-curriculum baselines. We show that a single rendered bond-line image, processed by a vision encoder, is sufficient for competitive molecular property prediction, i.e. $\textit{chemical insight from sight alone}$. The best curriculum-trained configuration achieves the top result on $\textbf{5 of 10}$ benchmarks and top two on $\textbf{all 10}$, at $\textbf{$\textit{80$\times$ lower}$}$ FLOPs than the nearest multi-modal competitor.

Aaditya Baranwal, Vishal Yadav, Abhishek Rajora

While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) demonstrate remarkable zero-shot recognition capabilities across a diverse spectrum of multimodal tasks, it yet remains an open question whether these architectures genuinely comprehend geometric structure or merely exploit RGB textures and contextual priors as statistical shortcuts. Existing evaluations fail to isolate this mechanism, conflating semantic reasoning with texture mapping and relying on imprecise annotations that inadvertently leak environmental cues. To address this gap, we introduce $\textbf{BareBones}$, a zero-shot benchmark designed to stress-test pure geometric shape comprehension. We curate pixel-level silhouettes of geometrically distinct classes across six datasets: five established segmentation sources (ImageNet-S, DIS5K, ThinObject5K, PASCAL VOC, CUB-200) and our novel flagship collection, WTP-Bench, establishing a noise-free geometric taxonomy. WTP-Bench is an extreme, fine-grained visual puzzle that forces models to identify inter-class geometric concepts from boundary contours alone. Our evaluation of 26 state-of-the-art proprietary and open-weight VLMs (eg. GPT-4.1, Gemini, Claude Sonnet 4.5, LLaVA) reveals a consistent, severe performance collapse under RGB deprivation, a phenomenon we term the $\textit{Texture Bias Cliff}$. By documenting universal structural blindspots, BareBones establishes a rigorous yardstick for genuine geometric grounding.

Priyank Pathak, Mukilan Karuppasamy, Aaditya Baranwal et al.

The impact of real-world noise on Open Vocabulary Object Detectors (OV-ODs) remains poorly understood due to their architectural complexity. We present our comprehensive analysis Robust Onion, an empirical study that uses controlled synthetic visual degradations to peel OV-ODs layer-by-layer, revealing how, why, and where robustness degrades, systematically analyzing feature collapse. Our findings reveal that models with similar vision backbones exhibit comparable robustness, driven by similar feature collapse at similar layers, while factors such as pretraining strategy, architectural nuances, and caption supervision contribute little. Robustness is primarily governed by the image domain rather than annotations, explaining the similar robustness impact on COCO and LVIS, and why datasets like ODinW-13 can give an impression of inflated robustness due to large, isolated objects. Finally, we validate our insights by improving robustness on real-world BDD100K, WiderFace, and VisDRONE via our lightweight plug-and-play NN & TK0 approach, using 96x fewer trainable parameters than end-to-end training. We also explain the prior works' robustness observations.

Aaditya Baranwal, Md Jahid Hasan, Shruti Vyas

Optical microscopy enables rapid, label-free imaging of live bacteria and is the standard instrument for species identification across clinical, environmental, and industrial microbiology. Yet field samples are routinely polymicrobial and may contain organisms that were never seen during system training, and no computer-vision benchmark tests multi-label species identification from phase-contrast microscopy (PCM) of such mixtures. We introduce Phase-contrast Optical bEnchmark for Bacterial Identification ($\textbf{PHOEBI}$), a wet-lab-prepared dataset of $120{,}000$ PCM images covering $40$ combinations of six rod-shaped species, paired with a leave-combinations-out (LCO) evaluation protocol that holds out entire species combinations to mirror the practical scenario of a model trained on catalogued mixtures that must generalise to unseen ones. On LCO, every gradient-trained per-image aggregator we test drops $0.39$ to $0.57$ F1 from the in-distribution to the held-out split, a systematic open-world recognition failure in the aggregator, not the visual representation. A linear probe of thirteen different encoders over the same features spreads only about six percentage points of F1 across general-purpose and biomedical pretraining objectives, confirming the representation is sound. We propose three lightweight $\textit{anchor-based}$ decoders that capture per-species presence geometrically over a shared frozen tile-feature pool, scoring $\textit{higher}$ on held-out combinations than on in-distribution validation.