Sergei Krutikov

Alexander Samarin, Sergei Krutikov, Anton Shevtsov et al.

Speculative decoding accelerates autoregressive large language model (LLM) inference by using a lightweight draft model to propose candidate tokens that are then verified in parallel by the target model. The speedup is significantly determined by the acceptance rate, yet standard training minimizes Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence as a proxy objective. While KL divergence and acceptance rate share the same global optimum, small draft models, having limited capacity, typically converge to suboptimal solutions where minimizing KL does not guarantee maximizing acceptance rate. To address this issue, we propose LK losses, special training objectives that directly target acceptance rate. Comprehensive experiments across four draft architectures and six target models, ranging from 8B to 685B parameters, demonstrate consistent improvements in acceptance metrics across all configurations compared to the standard KL-based training. We evaluate our approach on general, coding and math domains and report gains of up to 8-10% in average acceptance length. LK losses are easy to implement, introduce no computational overhead and can be directly integrated into any existing speculator training framework, making them a compelling alternative to the existing draft training objectives.

Anton Plaksin, Sergei Krutikov, Sergei Skvortsov et al.

Speculative decoding speeds up autoregressive generation in Large Language Models (LLMs) through a two-step procedure, where a lightweight draft model proposes tokens which the target model then verifies in a single forward pass. Although the drafter network is small in modern architectures, its LM-head still performs projection to a large vocabulary, becoming one of the major computational bottlenecks. In prior work this issue has been predominantly addressed via static or dynamic vocabulary truncation. Yet mitigating the bottleneck, these methods bring in extra complexity, such as special vocabulary curation, sophisticated inference-time logic or modifications of the training setup. In this paper, we propose SlimSpec, a low-rank parameterization of the drafter's LM-head that compresses the inner representation rather than the output, preserving full vocabulary support. We evaluate our method with EAGLE-3 drafter across three target models and diverse benchmarks in both latency- and throughput-bound inference regimes. SlimSpec achieves $4\text{-}5\times$ acceleration over the standard LM-head architecture while maintaining a competitive acceptance length, surpassing existing methods by up to $8\text{-}9\%$ of the end-to-end speedup. Our method requires minimal adjustments of training and inference pipelines. Combined with the aforementioned speedup improvements, it makes SlimSpec a strong alternative across wide variety of draft LM-head architectures.

Sergei Krutikov, Bulat Khaertdinov, Rodion Kiriukhin et al.

Transformer-based neural networks, empowered by Self-Supervised Learning (SSL), have demonstrated unprecedented performance across various domains. However, related literature suggests that tabular Transformers may struggle to outperform classical Machine Learning algorithms, such as Gradient Boosted Decision Trees (GBDT). In this paper, we aim to challenge GBDTs with tabular Transformers on a typical task faced in e-commerce, namely fraud detection. Our study is additionally motivated by the problem of selection bias, often occurring in real-life fraud detection systems. It is caused by the production system affecting which subset of traffic becomes labeled. This issue is typically addressed by sampling randomly a small part of the whole production data, referred to as a Control Group. This subset follows a target distribution of production data and therefore is usually preferred for training classification models with standard ML algorithms. Our methodology leverages the capabilities of Transformers to learn transferable representations using all available data by means of SSL, giving it an advantage over classical methods. Furthermore, we conduct large-scale experiments, pre-training tabular Transformers on vast amounts of data instances and fine-tuning them on smaller target datasets. The proposed approach outperforms heavily tuned GBDTs by a considerable margin of the Average Precision (AP) score in offline evaluations. Finally, we report the results of an online A/B experiment. Experimental results confirm the superiority of tabular Transformers compared to GBDTs in production, demonstrated by a statistically significant improvement in our business metric.