Kemal Derya

Kemal Derya, Berk Sunar

Defending large language models (LLMs) against jailbreak attacks, such as Greedy Coordinate Gradient (GCG), remains a challenge, particularly under adaptive threat models where an attacker directly targets the defense mechanism. JBShield, a recent jailbreak defense with a 0% attack success rate in some settings, detects malicious prompts via two concept signals, a toxic concept and a jailbreak concept. We design JB-GCG, which modifies GCG's objective to combine two terms: refusal-direction suppression via cosine similarity between the refusal direction and hidden-state representations, and toxic-concept regularization via JBShield's own toxic concept score. Across five configurations on Llama-3-8B, JB-GCG achieves an average ASR of 46.2%, reaching up to 53.4% in the strongest setting. We further show that our attack remains effective against JBShield-M, achieving ASR up to 30.7% across evaluated settings. The attack persists across multiple JBShield recalibrations, confirming that the vulnerability is structural rather than calibration-specific. We analyze the cosine-similarity signatures of jailbreak representations and find that they occupy a distinctive region in refusal-direction fingerprint space that neither harmless nor harmful prompts inhabit. We introduce Representation Trajectory Verification (RTV), a new defense based on Mahalanobis outlier detection over multi-layer refusal-direction fingerprints. RTV attains an AUROC of 0.99 against our attack. Finally, we design and evaluate an additional adaptive attack against RTV with full white-box knowledge of the defense; the best attack achieves only 7% ASR at 13x the computational cost. Our results show that strong non-adaptive detection does not imply robustness under adaptive threat models, and that multi-layer representation consistency is a more reliable foundation for jailbreak detection than single-layer concept similarity.

M. Caner Tol, Kemal Derya, Berk Sunar

We propose using reinforcement learning to address the challenges of discovering microarchitectural vulnerabilities, such as Spectre and Meltdown, which exploit subtle interactions in modern processors. Traditional methods like random fuzzing fail to efficiently explore the vast instruction space and often miss vulnerabilities that manifest under specific conditions. To overcome this, we introduce an intelligent, feedback-driven approach using RL. Our RL agents interact with the processor, learning from real-time feedback to prioritize instruction sequences more likely to reveal vulnerabilities, significantly improving the efficiency of the discovery process. We also demonstrate that RL systems adapt effectively to various microarchitectures, providing a scalable solution across processor generations. By automating the exploration process, we reduce the need for human intervention, enabling continuous learning that uncovers hidden vulnerabilities. Additionally, our approach detects subtle signals, such as timing anomalies or unusual cache behavior, that may indicate microarchitectural weaknesses. This proposal advances hardware security testing by introducing a more efficient, adaptive, and systematic framework for protecting modern processors. When unleashed on Intel Skylake-X and Raptor Lake microarchitectures, our RL agent was indeed able to generate instruction sequences that cause significant observable byte leakages through transient execution without generating any $μ$code assists, faults or interrupts. The newly identified leaky sequences stem from a variety of Intel instructions, e.g. including SERIALIZE, VERR/VERW, CLMUL, MMX-x87 transitions, LSL+RDSCP and LAR. These initial results give credence to the proposed approach.