Multi-Group Proportional Representation in RetrievalAlex Oesterling, Claudio Mayrink Verdun, Carol Xuan Long et al.
Image search and retrieval tasks can perpetuate harmful stereotypes, erase cultural identities, and amplify social disparities. Current approaches to mitigate these representational harms balance the number of retrieved items across population groups defined by a small number of (often binary) attributes. However, most existing methods overlook intersectional groups determined by combinations of group attributes, such as gender, race, and ethnicity. We introduce Multi-Group Proportional Representation (MPR), a novel metric that measures representation across intersectional groups. We develop practical methods for estimating MPR, provide theoretical guarantees, and propose optimization algorithms to ensure MPR in retrieval. We demonstrate that existing methods optimizing for equal and proportional representation metrics may fail to promote MPR. Crucially, our work shows that optimizing MPR yields more proportional representation across multiple intersectional groups specified by a rich function class, often with minimal compromise in retrieval accuracy.
1.2ITMar 3
Functional Properties of the Focal-EntropyJaimin Shah, Martina Cardone, Alex Dytso
The focal-loss has become a widely used alternative to cross-entropy in class-imbalanced classification problems, particularly in computer vision. Despite its empirical success, a systematic information-theoretic study of the focal-loss remains incomplete. In this work, we adopt a distributional viewpoint and study the focal-entropy, a focal-loss analogue of the cross-entropy. Our analysis establishes conditions for finiteness, convexity, and continuity of the focal-entropy, and provides various asymptotic characterizations. We prove the existence and uniqueness of the focal-entropy minimizer, describe its structure, and show that it can depart significantly from the data distribution. In particular, we rigorously show that the focal-loss amplifies mid-range probabilities, suppresses high-probability outcomes, and, under extreme class imbalance, induces an over-suppression regime in which very small probabilities are further diminished. These results, which are also experimentally validated, offer a theoretical foundation for understanding the focal-loss and clarify the trade-offs that it introduces when applied to imbalanced learning tasks.