Juyoung Lee

Jungsoo Lee, Jeonghoon Park, Daeyoung Kim et al.

In image classification, "debiasing" aims to train a classifier to be less susceptible to dataset bias, the strong correlation between peripheral attributes of data samples and a target class. For example, even if the frog class in the dataset mainly consists of frog images with a swamp background (i.e., bias-aligned samples), a debiased classifier should be able to correctly classify a frog at a beach (i.e., bias-conflicting samples). Recent debiasing approaches commonly use two components for debiasing, a biased model $f_B$ and a debiased model $f_D$. $f_B$ is trained to focus on bias-aligned samples (i.e., overfitted to the bias) while $f_D$ is mainly trained with bias-conflicting samples by concentrating on samples which $f_B$ fails to learn, leading $f_D$ to be less susceptible to the dataset bias. While the state-of-the-art debiasing techniques have aimed to better train $f_D$, we focus on training $f_B$, an overlooked component until now. Our empirical analysis reveals that removing the bias-conflicting samples from the training set for $f_B$ is important for improving the debiasing performance of $f_D$. This is due to the fact that the bias-conflicting samples work as noisy samples for amplifying the bias for $f_B$ since those samples do not include the bias attribute. To this end, we propose a simple yet effective data sample selection method which removes the bias-conflicting samples to construct a bias-amplified dataset for training $f_B$. Our data sample selection method can be directly applied to existing reweighting-based debiasing approaches, obtaining consistent performance boost and achieving the state-of-the-art performance on both synthetic and real-world datasets.

Jungsoo Lee, Juyoung Lee, Sanghun Jung et al.

Image classifiers often rely overly on peripheral attributes that have a strong correlation with the target class (i.e., dataset bias) when making predictions. Due to the dataset bias, the model correctly classifies data samples including bias attributes (i.e., bias-aligned samples) while failing to correctly predict those without bias attributes (i.e., bias-conflicting samples). Recently, a myriad of studies focus on mitigating such dataset bias, the task of which is referred to as debiasing. However, our comprehensive study indicates several issues need to be improved when conducting evaluation of debiasing in image classification. First, most of the previous studies do not specify how they select their hyper-parameters and model checkpoints (i.e., tuning criterion). Second, the debiasing studies until now evaluated their proposed methods on datasets with excessively high bias-severities, showing degraded performance on datasets with low bias severity. Third, the debiasing studies do not share consistent experimental settings (e.g., datasets and neural networks) which need to be standardized for fair comparisons. Based on such issues, this paper 1) proposes an evaluation metric `Align-Conflict (AC) score' for the tuning criterion, 2) includes experimental settings with low bias severity and shows that they are yet to be explored, and 3) unifies the standardized experimental settings to promote fair comparisons between debiasing methods. We believe that our findings and lessons inspire future researchers in debiasing to further push state-of-the-art performances with fair comparisons.

Jeonghoon Park, Chaeyeon Chung, Juyoung Lee et al.

In the image classification task, deep neural networks frequently rely on bias attributes that are spuriously correlated with a target class in the presence of dataset bias, resulting in degraded performance when applied to data without bias attributes. The task of debiasing aims to compel classifiers to learn intrinsic attributes that inherently define a target class rather than focusing on bias attributes. While recent approaches mainly focus on emphasizing the learning of data samples without bias attributes (i.e., bias-conflicting samples) compared to samples with bias attributes (i.e., bias-aligned samples), they fall short of directly guiding models where to focus for learning intrinsic features. To address this limitation, this paper proposes a method that provides the model with explicit spatial guidance that indicates the region of intrinsic features. We first identify the intrinsic features by investigating the class-discerning common features between a bias-aligned (BA) sample and a bias-conflicting (BC) sample (i.e., bias-contrastive pair). Next, we enhance the intrinsic features in the BA sample that are relatively under-exploited for prediction compared to the BC sample. To construct the bias-contrastive pair without using bias information, we introduce a bias-negative score that distinguishes BC samples from BA samples employing a biased model. The experiments demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on synthetic and real-world datasets with various levels of bias severity.

Jeonghoon Park, Juyoung Lee, Chaeyeon Chung et al.

Recent advancements in diffusion-based text-to-image (T2I) models have enabled the generation of high-quality and photorealistic images from text. However, they often exhibit societal biases related to gender, race, and socioeconomic status, thereby potentially reinforcing harmful stereotypes and shaping public perception in unintended ways. While existing bias mitigation methods demonstrate effectiveness, they often encounter attribute entanglement, where adjustments to attributes relevant to the bias (i.e., target attributes) unintentionally alter attributes unassociated with the bias (i.e., non-target attributes), causing undesirable distribution shifts. To address this challenge, we introduce Entanglement-Free Attention (EFA), a method that accurately incorporates target attributes (e.g., White, Black, and Asian) while preserving non-target attributes (e.g., background) during bias mitigation. At inference time, EFA randomly samples a target attribute with equal probability and adjusts the cross-attention in selected layers to incorporate the sampled attribute, achieving a fair distribution of target attributes. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EFA outperforms existing methods in mitigating bias while preserving non-target attributes, thereby maintaining the original model's output distribution and generative capacity.