Xiaohong Zhang

Weicong Qin, Yi Xu, Weijie Yu et al.

Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a cutting-edge approach in sequential recommendation, leveraging historical interactions to model dynamic user preferences. Current methods mainly focus on learning processed recommendation data in the form of sequence-to-sequence text. While effective, they exhibit three key limitations: 1) failing to decouple intra-user explicit features (e.g., product titles) from implicit behavioral patterns (e.g., brand loyalty) within interaction histories; 2) underutilizing cross-user collaborative filtering (CF) signals; and 3) relying on inefficient reflection update strategies. To address this, We propose MoRE (Mixture of REflectors), which introduces three perspective-aware offline reflection processes to address these gaps. This decomposition directly resolves Challenges 1 (explicit/implicit ambiguity) and 2 (CF underutilization). Furthermore, MoRE's meta-reflector employs a self-improving strategy and a dynamic selection mechanism (Challenge 3) to adapt to evolving user preferences. First, two intra-user reflectors decouple explicit and implicit patterns from a user's interaction sequence, mimicking traditional recommender systems' ability to distinguish surface-level and latent preferences. A third cross-user reflector captures CF signals by analyzing user similarity patterns from multiple users' interactions. To optimize reflection quality, MoRE's meta-reflector employs a offline self-improving strategy that evaluates reflection impacts through comparisons of presence/absence and iterative refinement of old/new versions, with a online contextual bandit mechanism dynamically selecting the optimal perspective for recommendation for each user. Code: https://github.com/E-qin/MoRE-Rec.

Xiang Cheng, Chengyan Pan, Minjun Zhao et al.

In-Context Learning (ICL) is an essential emergent ability of Large Language Models (LLMs), and recent studies introduce Chain-of-Thought (CoT) to exemplars of ICL to enhance the reasoning capability, especially in mathematics tasks. However, given the continuous advancement of model capabilities, it remains unclear whether CoT exemplars still benefit recent, stronger models in such tasks. Through systematic experiments, we find that for recent strong models such as the Qwen2.5 series, adding traditional CoT exemplars does not improve reasoning performance compared to Zero-Shot CoT. Instead, their primary function is to align the output format with human expectations. We further investigate the effectiveness of enhanced CoT exemplars, constructed using answers from advanced models such as \texttt{Qwen2.5-Max} and \texttt{DeepSeek-R1}. Experimental results indicate that these enhanced exemplars still fail to improve the model's reasoning performance. Further analysis reveals that models tend to ignore the exemplars and focus primarily on the instructions, leading to no observable gain in reasoning ability. Overall, our findings highlight the limitations of the current ICL+CoT framework in mathematical reasoning, calling for a re-examination of the ICL paradigm and the definition of exemplars.