Yuxuan Li

Jianhua Sun, Yuxuan Li, Longfei Xu et al.

Human cognition can leverage fundamental conceptual knowledge, like geometric and kinematic ones, to appropriately perceive, comprehend and interact with novel objects. Motivated by this finding, we aim to endow machine intelligence with an analogous capability through performing at the conceptual level, in order to understand and then interact with articulated objects, especially for those in novel categories, which is challenging due to the intricate geometric structures and diverse joint types of articulated objects. To achieve this goal, we propose Analytic Ontology Template (AOT), a parameterized and differentiable program description of generalized conceptual ontologies. A baseline approach called AOTNet driven by AOTs is designed accordingly to equip intelligent agents with these generalized concepts, and then empower the agents to effectively discover the conceptual knowledge on the structure and affordance of articulated objects. The AOT-driven approach yields benefits in three key perspectives: i) enabling concept-level understanding of articulated objects without relying on any real training data, ii) providing analytic structure information, and iii) introducing rich affordance information indicating proper ways of interaction. We conduct exhaustive experiments and the results demonstrate the superiority of our approach in understanding and then interacting with articulated objects.

Yuxuan Li, Victor Zhong

Learning to plan in grounded environments typically requires carefully designed reward functions or high-quality annotated demonstrations. Recent works show that pretrained foundation models, such as large language models (LLMs) and vision language models (VLMs), capture background knowledge helpful for planning, which reduces the amount of reward design and demonstrations needed for policy learning. We evaluate how well LLMs and VLMs provide feedback across symbolic, language, and continuous control environments. We consider prominent types of feedback for planning including binary feedback, preference feedback, action advising, goal advising, and delta action feedback. We also consider inference methods that impact feedback performance, including in-context learning, chain-of-thought, and access to environment dynamics. We find that foundation models can provide diverse high-quality feedback across domains. Moreover, larger and reasoning models consistently provide more accurate feedback, exhibit less bias, and benefit more from enhanced inference methods. Finally, feedback quality degrades for environments with complex dynamics or continuous state spaces and action spaces.