Xiangyu Liu

Jinfeng Li, Yuefeng Chen, Xiangyu Liu et al.

Pre-trained language models (PLMs) have revolutionized both the natural language processing research and applications. However, stereotypical biases (e.g., gender and racial discrimination) encoded in PLMs have raised negative ethical implications for PLMs, which critically limits their broader applications. To address the aforementioned unfairness issues, we present fairBERTs, a general framework for learning fair fine-tuned BERT series models by erasing the protected sensitive information via semantic and fairness-aware perturbations generated by a generative adversarial network. Through extensive qualitative and quantitative experiments on two real-world tasks, we demonstrate the great superiority of fairBERTs in mitigating unfairness while maintaining the model utility. We also verify the feasibility of transferring adversarial components in fairBERTs to other conventionally trained BERT-like models for yielding fairness improvements. Our findings may shed light on further research on building fairer fine-tuned PLMs.

Yucheng Ding, Yangwenjian Tan, Xiangyu Liu et al.

In many practical natural language applications, user data are highly sensitive, requiring anonymous uploads of text data from mobile devices to the cloud without user identifiers. However, the absence of user identifiers restricts the ability of cloud-based language models to provide personalized services, which are essential for catering to diverse user needs. The trivial method of replacing an explicit user identifier with a static user embedding as model input still compromises data anonymization. In this work, we propose to let each mobile device maintain a user-specific distribution to dynamically generate user embeddings, thereby breaking the one-to-one mapping between an embedding and a specific user. We further theoretically demonstrate that to prevent the cloud from tracking users via uploaded embeddings, the local distributions of different users should either be derived from a linearly dependent space to avoid identifiability or be close to each other to prevent accurate attribution. Evaluation on both public and industrial datasets using different language models reveals a remarkable improvement in accuracy from incorporating anonymous user embeddings, while preserving real-time inference requirement.

Pankayaraj Pathmanathan, Souradip Chakraborty, Xiangyu Liu et al.

Recent advancements in Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) have significantly impacted the alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs). The sensitivity of reinforcement learning algorithms such as Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) has led to new line work on Direct Policy Optimization (DPO), which treats RLHF in a supervised learning framework. The increased practical use of these RLHF methods warrants an analysis of their vulnerabilities. In this work, we investigate the vulnerabilities of DPO to poisoning attacks under different scenarios and compare the effectiveness of preference poisoning, a first of its kind. We comprehensively analyze DPO's vulnerabilities under different types of attacks, i.e., backdoor and non-backdoor attacks, and different poisoning methods across a wide array of language models, i.e., LLama 7B, Mistral 7B, and Gemma 7B. We find that unlike PPO-based methods, which, when it comes to backdoor attacks, require at least 4\% of the data to be poisoned to elicit harmful behavior, we exploit the true vulnerabilities of DPO more simply so we can poison the model with only as much as 0.5\% of the data. We further investigate the potential reasons behind the vulnerability and how well this vulnerability translates into backdoor vs non-backdoor attacks.