4.6LGJan 24, 2022
IMO$^3$: Interactive Multi-Objective Off-Policy OptimizationNan Wang, Hongning Wang, Maryam Karimzadehgan et al.
Most real-world optimization problems have multiple objectives. A system designer needs to find a policy that trades off these objectives to reach a desired operating point. This problem has been studied extensively in the setting of known objective functions. We consider a more practical but challenging setting of unknown objective functions. In industry, this problem is mostly approached with online A/B testing, which is often costly and inefficient. As an alternative, we propose interactive multi-objective off-policy optimization (IMO$^3$). The key idea in our approach is to interact with a system designer using policies evaluated in an off-policy fashion to uncover which policy maximizes her unknown utility function. We theoretically show that IMO$^3$ identifies a near-optimal policy with high probability, depending on the amount of feedback from the designer and training data for off-policy estimation. We demonstrate its effectiveness empirically on multiple multi-objective optimization problems.
10.4IRNov 1, 2021
Comparative Explanations of RecommendationsAobo Yang, Nan Wang, Renqin Cai et al.
As recommendation is essentially a comparative (or ranking) process, a good explanation should illustrate to users why an item is believed to be better than another, i.e., comparative explanations about the recommended items. Ideally, after reading the explanations, a user should reach the same ranking of items as the system's. Unfortunately, little research attention has yet been paid on such comparative explanations. In this work, we develop an extract-and-refine architecture to explain the relative comparisons among a set of ranked items from a recommender system. For each recommended item, we first extract one sentence from its associated reviews that best suits the desired comparison against a set of reference items. Then this extracted sentence is further articulated with respect to the target user through a generative model to better explain why the item is recommended. We design a new explanation quality metric based on BLEU to guide the end-to-end training of the extraction and refinement components, which avoids generation of generic content. Extensive offline evaluations on two large recommendation benchmark datasets and serious user studies against an array of state-of-the-art explainable recommendation algorithms demonstrate the necessity of comparative explanations and the effectiveness of our solution.
13.3IRJan 24, 2021
Explanation as a Defense of RecommendationAobo Yang, Nan Wang, Hongbo Deng et al.
Textual explanations have proved to help improve user satisfaction on machine-made recommendations. However, current mainstream solutions loosely connect the learning of explanation with the learning of recommendation: for example, they are often separately modeled as rating prediction and content generation tasks. In this work, we propose to strengthen their connection by enforcing the idea of sentiment alignment between a recommendation and its corresponding explanation. At training time, the two learning tasks are joined by a latent sentiment vector, which is encoded by the recommendation module and used to make word choices for explanation generation. At both training and inference time, the explanation module is required to generate explanation text that matches sentiment predicted by the recommendation module. Extensive experiments demonstrate our solution outperforms a rich set of baselines in both recommendation and explanation tasks, especially on the improved quality of its generated explanations. More importantly, our user studies confirm our generated explanations help users better recognize the differences between recommended items and understand why an item is recommended.
11.1IRApr 22, 2020
Graph Learning Approaches to Recommender Systems: A ReviewShoujin Wang, Liang Hu, Yan Wang et al.
Recent years have witnessed the fast development of the emerging topic of Graph Learning based Recommender Systems (GLRS). GLRS mainly employ the advanced graph learning approaches to model users' preferences and intentions as well as items' characteristics and popularity for Recommender Systems (RS). Differently from conventional RS, including content based filtering and collaborative filtering, GLRS are built on simple or complex graphs where various objects, e.g., users, items, and attributes, are explicitly or implicitly connected. With the rapid development of graph learning, exploring and exploiting homogeneous or heterogeneous relations in graphs is a promising direction for building advanced RS. In this paper, we provide a systematic review of GLRS, on how they obtain the knowledge from graphs to improve the accuracy, reliability and explainability for recommendations. First, we characterize and formalize GLRS, and then summarize and categorize the key challenges in this new research area. Then, we survey the most recent and important developments in the area. Finally, we share some new research directions in this vibrant area.
19.6IRJun 3, 2019
The FacT: Taming Latent Factor Models for Explainability with Factorization TreesYiyi Tao, Yiling Jia, Nan Wang et al.
Latent factor models have achieved great success in personalized recommendations, but they are also notoriously difficult to explain. In this work, we integrate regression trees to guide the learning of latent factor models for recommendation, and use the learnt tree structure to explain the resulting latent factors. Specifically, we build regression trees on users and items respectively with user-generated reviews, and associate a latent profile to each node on the trees to represent users and items. With the growth of regression tree, the latent factors are gradually refined under the regularization imposed by the tree structure. As a result, we are able to track the creation of latent profiles by looking into the path of each factor on regression trees, which thus serves as an explanation for the resulting recommendations. Extensive experiments on two large collections of Amazon and Yelp reviews demonstrate the advantage of our model over several competitive baseline algorithms. Besides, our extensive user study also confirms the practical value of explainable recommendations generated by our model.
29.2IRJun 10, 2018
Explainable Recommendation via Multi-Task Learning in Opinionated Text DataNan Wang, Hongning Wang, Yiling Jia et al.
Explaining automatically generated recommendations allows users to make more informed and accurate decisions about which results to utilize, and therefore improves their satisfaction. In this work, we develop a multi-task learning solution for explainable recommendation. Two companion learning tasks of user preference modeling for recommendation} and \textit{opinionated content modeling for explanation are integrated via a joint tensor factorization. As a result, the algorithm predicts not only a user's preference over a list of items, i.e., recommendation, but also how the user would appreciate a particular item at the feature level, i.e., opinionated textual explanation. Extensive experiments on two large collections of Amazon and Yelp reviews confirmed the effectiveness of our solution in both recommendation and explanation tasks, compared with several existing recommendation algorithms. And our extensive user study clearly demonstrates the practical value of the explainable recommendations generated by our algorithm.