Yidong Gan

Yidong Gan, David D. Nguyen, Yang Lin et al.

We present RAG-Coding, an agentic method for automated ICD-10-CM coding. RAG-Coding orchestrates four large language model (LLM) agents and grounds their coding decisions in external knowledge sources (e.g. the official coding tabular list and guidelines). By retrieving and cross-referencing relevant knowledge in these sources, the agents enhance coding accuracy and ensure clinical compliance. On the MDACE dataset, RAG-Coding outperforms the best LLM-based baseline by 8-13\% in micro-F1 and 2-8\% in macro-F1 across multiple LLM backbones. Compared to the state-of-the-art pretrained language model method, PLM-ICD, RAG-Coding exhibits higher micro recall (+11\%), while PLM-ICD exhibits higher micro precision (+6\%), yielding comparable micro- and macro-F1. Ablations show stepwise gains, highlighting the importance of incorporating external knowledge. We also release MDACE-2025, updating the original dataset with expert re-annotations with the latest 2025 ICD-10-CM guidelines. This update features more fine-grained code labels and enables evaluation against current clinical standards.

Jieting Long, Zewei Shi, Penghao Jiang et al.

Document-based Visual Question Answering poses a challenging task between linguistic sense disambiguation and fine-grained multimodal retrieval. Although there has been encouraging progress in document-based question answering due to the utilization of large language and open-world prior models\cite{1}, several challenges persist, including prolonged response times, extended inference durations, and imprecision in matching. In order to overcome these challenges, we propose Jaegar, a concatenation-based multi-transformer VQA model. To derive question features, we leverage the exceptional capabilities of RoBERTa large\cite{2} and GPT2-xl\cite{3} as feature extractors. Subsequently, we subject the outputs from both models to a concatenation process. This operation allows the model to consider information from diverse sources concurrently, strengthening its representational capability. By leveraging pre-trained models for feature extraction, our approach has the potential to amplify the performance of these models through concatenation. After concatenation, we apply dimensionality reduction to the output features, reducing the model's computational effectiveness and inference time. Empirical results demonstrate that our proposed model achieves competitive performance on Task C of the PDF-VQA Dataset. If the user adds any new data, they should make sure to style it as per the instructions provided in previous sections.

Yuzhe Zhang, Yipeng Zhang, Yidong Gan et al.

Causal graph recovery is traditionally done using statistical estimation-based methods or based on individual's knowledge about variables of interests. They often suffer from data collection biases and limitations of individuals' knowledge. The advance of large language models (LLMs) provides opportunities to address these problems. We propose a novel method that leverages LLMs to deduce causal relationships in general causal graph recovery tasks. This method leverages knowledge compressed in LLMs and knowledge LLMs extracted from scientific publication database as well as experiment data about factors of interest to achieve this goal. Our method gives a prompting strategy to extract associational relationships among those factors and a mechanism to perform causality verification for these associations. Comparing to other LLM-based methods that directly instruct LLMs to do the highly complex causal reasoning, our method shows clear advantage on causal graph quality on benchmark datasets. More importantly, as causality among some factors may change as new research results emerge, our method show sensitivity to new evidence in the literature and can provide useful information for updating causal graphs accordingly.

Yidong Gan, Maciej Rybinski, Ben Hachey et al.

Clinical coding is crucial for healthcare billing and data analysis. Manual clinical coding is labour-intensive and error-prone, which has motivated research towards full automation of the process. However, our analysis, based on US English electronic health records and automated coding research using these records, shows that widely used evaluation methods are not aligned with real clinical contexts. For example, evaluations that focus on the top 50 most common codes are an oversimplification, as there are thousands of codes used in practice. This position paper aims to align AI coding research more closely with practical challenges of clinical coding. Based on our analysis, we offer eight specific recommendations, suggesting ways to improve current evaluation methods. Additionally, we propose new AI-based methods beyond automated coding, suggesting alternative approaches to assist clinical coders in their workflows.