Xiao Yang

Xiao Yang, Jiawei Chen, Jun Luo et al.

The emergence of multimodal LLM-based agents (MLAs) has transformed interaction paradigms by seamlessly integrating vision, language, action and dynamic environments, enabling unprecedented autonomous capabilities across GUI applications ranging from web automation to mobile systems. However, MLAs introduce critical trustworthiness challenges that extend far beyond traditional language models' limitations, as they can directly modify digital states and trigger irreversible real-world consequences. Existing benchmarks inadequately tackle these unique challenges posed by MLAs' actionable outputs, long-horizon uncertainty and multimodal attack vectors. In this paper, we introduce MLA-Trust, the first comprehensive and unified framework that evaluates the MLA trustworthiness across four principled dimensions: truthfulness, controllability, safety and privacy. We utilize websites and mobile applications as realistic testbeds, designing 34 high-risk interactive tasks and curating rich evaluation datasets. Large-scale experiments involving 13 state-of-the-art agents reveal previously unexplored trustworthiness vulnerabilities unique to multimodal interactive scenarios. For instance, proprietary and open-source GUI-interacting MLAs pose more severe trustworthiness risks than static MLLMs, particularly in high-stakes domains; the transition from static MLLMs into interactive MLAs considerably compromises trustworthiness, enabling harmful content generation in multi-step interactions that standalone MLLMs would typically prevent; multi-step execution, while enhancing the adaptability of MLAs, involves latent nonlinear risk accumulation across successive interactions, circumventing existing safeguards and resulting in unpredictable derived risks. Moreover, we present an extensible toolbox to facilitate continuous evaluation of MLA trustworthiness across diverse interactive environments.

Xiao Yang, Enmin Song, Guangzhi Ma et al.

Colon cancer is expected to become the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States in 2023. Although colonoscopy is one of the most effective methods for early prevention of colon cancer, up to 30% of polyps may be missed by endoscopists, thereby increasing patients' risk of developing colon cancer. Though deep neural networks have been proven to be an effective means of enhancing the detection rate of polyps. However, the variation of polyp size brings the following problems: (1) it is difficult to design an efficient and sufficient multi-scale feature fusion structure; (2) matching polyps of different sizes with fixed-size anchor boxes is a hard challenge. These problems reduce the performance of polyp detection and also lower the model's training and detection efficiency. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a new model called YOLO-OB. Specifically, we developed a bidirectional multiscale feature fusion structure, BiSPFPN, which could enhance the feature fusion capability across different depths of a CNN. We employed the ObjectBox detection head, which used a center-based anchor-free box regression strategy that could detect polyps of different sizes on feature maps of any scale. Experiments on the public dataset SUN and the self-collected colon polyp dataset Union demonstrated that the proposed model significantly improved various performance metrics of polyp detection, especially the recall rate. Compared to the state-of-the-art results on the public dataset SUN, the proposed method achieved a 6.73% increase on recall rate from 91.5% to 98.23%. Furthermore, our YOLO-OB was able to achieve real-time polyp detection at a speed of 39 frames per second using a RTX3090 graphics card. The implementation of this paper can be found here: https://github.com/seanyan62/YOLO-OB.

Yichi Zhang, Yao Huang, Yitong Sun et al.

Despite the superior capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) across diverse tasks, they still face significant trustworthiness challenges. Yet, current literature on the assessment of trustworthy MLLMs remains limited, lacking a holistic evaluation to offer thorough insights into future improvements. In this work, we establish MultiTrust, the first comprehensive and unified benchmark on the trustworthiness of MLLMs across five primary aspects: truthfulness, safety, robustness, fairness, and privacy. Our benchmark employs a rigorous evaluation strategy that addresses both multimodal risks and cross-modal impacts, encompassing 32 diverse tasks with self-curated datasets. Extensive experiments with 21 modern MLLMs reveal some previously unexplored trustworthiness issues and risks, highlighting the complexities introduced by the multimodality and underscoring the necessity for advanced methodologies to enhance their reliability. For instance, typical proprietary models still struggle with the perception of visually confusing images and are vulnerable to multimodal jailbreaking and adversarial attacks; MLLMs are more inclined to disclose privacy in text and reveal ideological and cultural biases even when paired with irrelevant images in inference, indicating that the multimodality amplifies the internal risks from base LLMs. Additionally, we release a scalable toolbox for standardized trustworthiness research, aiming to facilitate future advancements in this important field. Code and resources are publicly available at: https://multi-trust.github.io/.