Cheng Cheng

Cheng Cheng, Zeping Chen, Rui Xie et al.

Accurately predicting early recurrence in brain tumor patients following surgical resection remains a clinical challenge. This study proposes a multi-modal machine learning framework that integrates structural MRI features with clinical biomarkers to improve postoperative recurrence prediction. We employ four machine learning algorithms -- Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Random Survival Forest (RSF), CoxBoost, and XGBoost -- and validate model performance using concordance index (C-index), time-dependent AUC, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. Our model demonstrates promising performance, offering a potential tool for risk stratification and personalized follow-up planning.

Jing Zhang, Yong Zhang, Suhua Zhan et al.

Physiological signals that provide the objective repression of human affective states are attracted increasing attention in the emotion recognition field. However, the single signal is difficult to obtain completely and accurately description for emotion. Multiple physiological signals fusing models, building the uniform classification model by means of consistent and complementary information from different emotions to improve recognition performance. Original fusing models usually choose the particular classification method to recognition, which is ignoring different distribution of multiple signals. Aiming above problems, in this work, we propose an emotion classification model through multiple modal physiological signals for different emotions. Features are extracted from EEG, EMG, EOG signals for characterizing emotional state on valence and arousal levels. For characterization, four bands filtering theta, beta, alpha, gamma for signal preprocessing are adopted and three Hjorth parameters are computing as features. To improve classification performance, an ensemble classifier is built. Experiments are conducted on the benchmark DEAP datasets. For the two-class task, the best result on arousal is 94.42\%, the best result on valence is 94.02\%, respectively. For the four-class task, the highest average classification accuracy is 90.74, and it shows good stability. The influence of different peripheral physiological signals for results is also analyzed in this paper.