Ke Wang

LG
h-index18
4papers
50citations
Novelty53%
AI Score26

4 Papers

6.6LGOct 5, 2023
Burning the Adversarial Bridges: Robust Windows Malware Detection Against Binary-level Mutations

Ahmed Abusnaina, Yizhen Wang, Sunpreet Arora et al.

Toward robust malware detection, we explore the attack surface of existing malware detection systems. We conduct root-cause analyses of the practical binary-level black-box adversarial malware examples. Additionally, we uncover the sensitivity of volatile features within the detection engines and exhibit their exploitability. Highlighting volatile information channels within the software, we introduce three software pre-processing steps to eliminate the attack surface, namely, padding removal, software stripping, and inter-section information resetting. Further, to counter the emerging section injection attacks, we propose a graph-based section-dependent information extraction scheme for software representation. The proposed scheme leverages aggregated information within various sections in the software to enable robust malware detection and mitigate adversarial settings. Our experimental results show that traditional malware detection models are ineffective against adversarial threats. However, the attack surface can be largely reduced by eliminating the volatile information. Therefore, we propose simple-yet-effective methods to mitigate the impacts of binary manipulation attacks. Overall, our graph-based malware detection scheme can accurately detect malware with an area under the curve score of 88.32\% and a score of 88.19% under a combination of binary manipulation attacks, exhibiting the efficiency of our proposed scheme.

3.3LGOct 14, 2022
Spatiotemporal Classification with limited labels using Constrained Clustering for large datasets

Praveen Ravirathinam, Rahul Ghosh, Ke Wang et al.

Creating separable representations via representation learning and clustering is critical in analyzing large unstructured datasets with only a few labels. Separable representations can lead to supervised models with better classification capabilities and additionally aid in generating new labeled samples. Most unsupervised and semisupervised methods to analyze large datasets do not leverage the existing small amounts of labels to get better representations. In this paper, we propose a spatiotemporal clustering paradigm that uses spatial and temporal features combined with a constrained loss to produce separable representations. We show the working of this method on the newly published dataset ReaLSAT, a dataset of surface water dynamics for over 680,000 lakes across the world, making it an essential dataset in terms of ecology and sustainability. Using this large unlabelled dataset, we first show how a spatiotemporal representation is better compared to just spatial or temporal representation. We then show how we can learn even better representation using a constrained loss with few labels. We conclude by showing how our method, using few labels, can pick out new labeled samples from the unlabeled data, which can be used to augment supervised methods leading to better classification.

2.3MLSep 5, 2023
Computing SHAP Efficiently Using Model Structure Information

Linwei Hu, Ke Wang

SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) has become a popular method to attribute the prediction of a machine learning model on an input to its features. One main challenge of SHAP is the computation time. An exact computation of Shapley values requires exponential time complexity. Therefore, many approximation methods are proposed in the literature. In this paper, we propose methods that can compute SHAP exactly in polynomial time or even faster for SHAP definitions that satisfy our additivity and dummy assumptions (eg, kernal SHAP and baseline SHAP). We develop different strategies for models with different levels of model structure information: known functional decomposition, known order of model (defined as highest order of interaction in the model), or unknown order. For the first case, we demonstrate an additive property and a way to compute SHAP from the lower-order functional components. For the second case, we derive formulas that can compute SHAP in polynomial time. Both methods yield exact SHAP results. Finally, if even the order of model is unknown, we propose an iterative way to approximate Shapley values. The three methods we propose are computationally efficient when the order of model is not high which is typically the case in practice. We compare with sampling approach proposed in Castor & Gomez (2008) using simulation studies to demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed methods.

13.8ASFeb 8, 2022
InferGrad: Improving Diffusion Models for Vocoder by Considering Inference in Training

Zehua Chen, Xu Tan, Ke Wang et al.

Denoising diffusion probabilistic models (diffusion models for short) require a large number of iterations in inference to achieve the generation quality that matches or surpasses the state-of-the-art generative models, which invariably results in slow inference speed. Previous approaches aim to optimize the choice of inference schedule over a few iterations to speed up inference. However, this results in reduced generation quality, mainly because the inference process is optimized separately, without jointly optimizing with the training process. In this paper, we propose InferGrad, a diffusion model for vocoder that incorporates inference process into training, to reduce the inference iterations while maintaining high generation quality. More specifically, during training, we generate data from random noise through a reverse process under inference schedules with a few iterations, and impose a loss to minimize the gap between the generated and ground-truth data samples. Then, unlike existing approaches, the training of InferGrad considers the inference process. The advantages of InferGrad are demonstrated through experiments on the LJSpeech dataset showing that InferGrad achieves better voice quality than the baseline WaveGrad under same conditions while maintaining the same voice quality as the baseline but with $3$x speedup ($2$ iterations for InferGrad vs $6$ iterations for WaveGrad).