Joseph W. Cutler

Cynthia Richey, Joseph W. Cutler, Harrison Goldstein et al.

Property-based testing (PBT) relies on generators for random test cases, often constructed using embedded domain specific languages, which provide expressive combinators for building and composing generators. The effectiveness of PBT depends critically on the speed of these generators. However, careful measurements show that the generator performance of widely used PBT libraries falls well short of what is possible, due principally to (1) the abstraction overhead of their combinator-heavy style and (2) suboptimal sources of randomness. We characterize, quantify, and address these bottlenecks. To eliminate abstraction overheads, we propose a technique based on multi-stage programming, dubbed Allegro. We apply this technique to leading generator libraries in OCaml and Scala 3, significantly improving performance. To quantify the performance impact of the randomness source, we carry out a controlled experiment, replacing the randomness in the OCaml PBT library with an optimized version. Both interventions exactly preserve the semantics of generators, enabling precise, pointwise comparisons. Together, these improvements find bugs up to $13\times$ faster.

Joseph W. Cutler, Alex Collins, Bin Fan et al.

PyPM is a Python-based domain specific language (DSL) for building rewrite-based optimization passes on machine learning computation graphs. Users define individual optimizations by writing (a) patterns that match subgraphs of a computation graph and (b) corresponding rules which replace a matched subgraph with an optimized kernel. PyPM is distinguished from the many other DSLs for defining rewriting passes by its complex and novel pattern language which borrows concepts from logic programming. PyPM patterns can be recursive, nondeterminstic, and can require checking domain-specific constraints such as the shapes of tensors. The PyPM implementation is thus similarly complicated, consisting of thousands of lines of C++ code. In this paper, we present our work on building PyPM, as well as formalizing and distilling and this complexity to an understandable mathematical core. We have developed a formal core calculus expressing the main operations of the PyPM pattern language. We define both a declarative semantics - describing which patterns match which terms - and an algorithmic semantics - an idealized version of the PyPM pattern interpreter - and prove their equivalence. The development is fully mechanized in the Coq proof assistant.