Yue Wang

Xiaobo Liang, Lijun Wu, Juntao Li et al.

Dropout is a powerful and widely used technique to regularize the training of deep neural networks. In this paper, we introduce a simple regularization strategy upon dropout in model training, namely R-Drop, which forces the output distributions of different sub models generated by dropout to be consistent with each other. Specifically, for each training sample, R-Drop minimizes the bidirectional KL-divergence between the output distributions of two sub models sampled by dropout. Theoretical analysis reveals that R-Drop reduces the freedom of the model parameters and complements dropout. Experiments on $\bf{5}$ widely used deep learning tasks ($\bf{18}$ datasets in total), including neural machine translation, abstractive summarization, language understanding, language modeling, and image classification, show that R-Drop is universally effective. In particular, it yields substantial improvements when applied to fine-tune large-scale pre-trained models, e.g., ViT, RoBERTa-large, and BART, and achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performances with the vanilla Transformer model on WMT14 English$\to$German translation ($\bf{30.91}$ BLEU) and WMT14 English$\to$French translation ($\bf{43.95}$ BLEU), even surpassing models trained with extra large-scale data and expert-designed advanced variants of Transformer models. Our code is available at GitHub{\url{https://github.com/dropreg/R-Drop}}.

Yue Wang, Wei Chen, Yuting Liu et al.

In reinforcement learning (RL) , one of the key components is policy evaluation, which aims to estimate the value function (i.e., expected long-term accumulated reward) of a policy. With a good policy evaluation method, the RL algorithms will estimate the value function more accurately and find a better policy. When the state space is large or continuous \emph{Gradient-based Temporal Difference(GTD)} policy evaluation algorithms with linear function approximation are widely used. Considering that the collection of the evaluation data is both time and reward consuming, a clear understanding of the finite sample performance of the policy evaluation algorithms is very important to reinforcement learning. Under the assumption that data are i.i.d. generated, previous work provided the finite sample analysis of the GTD algorithms with constant step size by converting them into convex-concave saddle point problems. However, it is well-known that, the data are generated from Markov processes rather than i.i.d. in RL problems.. In this paper, in the realistic Markov setting, we derive the finite sample bounds for the general convex-concave saddle point problems, and hence for the GTD algorithms. We have the following discussions based on our bounds. (1) With variants of step size, GTD algorithms converge. (2) The convergence rate is determined by the step size, with the mixing time of the Markov process as the coefficient. The faster the Markov processes mix, the faster the convergence. (3) We explain that the experience replay trick is effective by improving the mixing property of the Markov process. To the best of our knowledge, our analysis is the first to provide finite sample bounds for the GTD algorithms in Markov setting.

Qi Meng, Wei Chen, Yue Wang et al.

When using stochastic gradient descent to solve large-scale machine learning problems, a common practice of data processing is to shuffle the training data, partition the data across multiple machines if needed, and then perform several epochs of training on the re-shuffled (either locally or globally) data. The above procedure makes the instances used to compute the gradients no longer independently sampled from the training data set. Then does the distributed SGD method have desirable convergence properties in this practical situation? In this paper, we give answers to this question. First, we give a mathematical formulation for the practical data processing procedure in distributed machine learning, which we call data partition with global/local shuffling. We observe that global shuffling is equivalent to without-replacement sampling if the shuffling operations are independent. We prove that SGD with global shuffling has convergence guarantee in both convex and non-convex cases. An interesting finding is that, the non-convex tasks like deep learning are more suitable to apply shuffling comparing to the convex tasks. Second, we conduct the convergence analysis for SGD with local shuffling. The convergence rate for local shuffling is slower than that for global shuffling, since it will lose some information if there's no communication between partitioned data. Finally, we consider the situation when the permutation after shuffling is not uniformly distributed (insufficient shuffling), and discuss the condition under which this insufficiency will not influence the convergence rate. Our theoretical results provide important insights to large-scale machine learning, especially in the selection of data processing methods in order to achieve faster convergence and good speedup. Our theoretical findings are verified by extensive experiments on logistic regression and deep neural networks.

Qi Meng, Yue Wang, Wei Chen et al.

Many machine learning tasks can be formulated as Regularized Empirical Risk Minimization (R-ERM), and solved by optimization algorithms such as gradient descent (GD), stochastic gradient descent (SGD), and stochastic variance reduction (SVRG). Conventional analysis on these optimization algorithms focuses on their convergence rates during the training process, however, people in the machine learning community may care more about the generalization performance of the learned model on unseen test data. In this paper, we investigate on this issue, by using stability as a tool. In particular, we decompose the generalization error for R-ERM, and derive its upper bound for both convex and non-convex cases. In convex cases, we prove that the generalization error can be bounded by the convergence rate of the optimization algorithm and the stability of the R-ERM process, both in expectation (in the order of $\mathcal{O}((1/n)+\mathbb{E}ρ(T))$, where $ρ(T)$ is the convergence error and $T$ is the number of iterations) and in high probability (in the order of $\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{\log{1/δ}}{\sqrt{n}}+ρ(T)\right)$ with probability $1-δ$). For non-convex cases, we can also obtain a similar expected generalization error bound. Our theorems indicate that 1) along with the training process, the generalization error will decrease for all the optimization algorithms under our investigation; 2) Comparatively speaking, SVRG has better generalization ability than GD and SGD. We have conducted experiments on both convex and non-convex problems, and the experimental results verify our theoretical findings.