LGOct 25, 2022
Line Graph Contrastive Learning for Link PredictionZehua Zhang, Shilin Sun, Guixiang Ma et al.
Link prediction tasks focus on predicting possible future connections. Most existing researches measure the likelihood of links by different similarity scores on node pairs and predict links between nodes. However, the similarity-based approaches have some challenges in information loss on nodes and generalization ability on similarity indexes. To address the above issues, we propose a Line Graph Contrastive Learning(LGCL) method to obtain rich information with multiple perspectives. LGCL obtains a subgraph view by h-hop subgraph sampling with target node pairs. After transforming the sampled subgraph into a line graph, the link prediction task is converted into a node classification task, which graph convolution progress can learn edge embeddings from graphs more effectively. Then we design a novel cross-scale contrastive learning framework on the line graph and the subgraph to maximize the mutual information of them, so that fuses the structure and feature information. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed LGCL outperforms the state-of-the-art methods and has better performance on generalization and robustness.
CVDec 18, 2024Code
A Review of Multimodal Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Past, Present and FutureShilin Sun, Wenbin An, Feng Tian et al.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly developed through advancements in computational power and the growth of massive datasets. However, this progress has also heightened challenges in interpreting the "black-box" nature of AI models. To address these concerns, eXplainable AI (XAI) has emerged with a focus on transparency and interpretability to enhance human understanding and trust in AI decision-making processes. In the context of multimodal data fusion and complex reasoning scenarios, the proposal of Multimodal eXplainable AI (MXAI) integrates multiple modalities for prediction and explanation tasks. Meanwhile, the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to remarkable breakthroughs in natural language processing, yet their complexity has further exacerbated the issue of MXAI. To gain key insights into the development of MXAI methods and provide crucial guidance for building more transparent, fair, and trustworthy AI systems, we review the MXAI methods from a historical perspective and categorize them across four eras: traditional machine learning, deep learning, discriminative foundation models, and generative LLMs. We also review evaluation metrics and datasets used in MXAI research, concluding with a discussion of future challenges and directions. A project related to this review has been created at https://github.com/ShilinSun/mxai_review.