15.1LGMay 30, 2022
Quantum Multi-Armed Bandits and Stochastic Linear Bandits Enjoy Logarithmic RegretsZongqi Wan, Zhijie Zhang, Tongyang Li et al.
Multi-arm bandit (MAB) and stochastic linear bandit (SLB) are important models in reinforcement learning, and it is well-known that classical algorithms for bandits with time horizon $T$ suffer $Ω(\sqrt{T})$ regret. In this paper, we study MAB and SLB with quantum reward oracles and propose quantum algorithms for both models with $O(\mbox{poly}(\log T))$ regrets, exponentially improving the dependence in terms of $T$. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first provable quantum speedup for regrets of bandit problems and in general exploitation in reinforcement learning. Compared to previous literature on quantum exploration algorithms for MAB and reinforcement learning, our quantum input model is simpler and only assumes quantum oracles for each individual arm.
3.3LGApr 27, 2022
Bounded Memory Adversarial Bandits with Composite Anonymous Delayed FeedbackZongqi Wan, Xiaoming Sun, Jialin Zhang
We study the adversarial bandit problem with composite anonymous delayed feedback. In this setting, losses of an action are split into $d$ components, spreading over consecutive rounds after the action is chosen. And in each round, the algorithm observes the aggregation of losses that come from the latest $d$ rounds. Previous works focus on oblivious adversarial setting, while we investigate the harder non-oblivious setting. We show non-oblivious setting incurs $Ω(T)$ pseudo regret even when the loss sequence is bounded memory. However, we propose a wrapper algorithm which enjoys $o(T)$ policy regret on many adversarial bandit problems with the assumption that the loss sequence is bounded memory. Especially, for $K$-armed bandit and bandit convex optimization, we have $\mathcal{O}(T^{2/3})$ policy regret bound. We also prove a matching lower bound for $K$-armed bandit. Our lower bound works even when the loss sequence is oblivious but the delay is non-oblivious. It answers the open problem proposed in \cite{wang2021adaptive}, showing that non-oblivious delay is enough to incur $\tildeΩ(T^{2/3})$ regret.
2.3SISep 13, 2021
Online Influence Maximization under the Independent Cascade Model with Node-Level FeedbackZhijie Zhang, Wei Chen, Xiaoming Sun et al.
We study the online influence maximization (OIM) problem in social networks, where the learner repeatedly chooses seed nodes to generate cascades, observes the cascade feedback, and gradually learns the best seeds that generate the largest cascade in multiple rounds. In the demand of the real world, we work with node-level feedback instead of the common edge-level feedback in the literature. The edge-level feedback reveals all edges that pass through information in a cascade, whereas the node-level feedback only reveals the activated nodes with timestamps. The node-level feedback is arguably more realistic since in practice it is relatively easy to observe who is influenced but very difficult to observe from which relationship (edge) the influence comes. Previously, there is a nearly optimal $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$-regret algorithm for OIM problem under the linear threshold (LT) diffusion model with node-level feedback. It remains unknown whether the same algorithm exists for the independent cascade (IC) diffusion model. In this paper, we resolve this open problem by presenting an $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$-regret algorithm for OIM problem under the IC model with node-level feedback.