Jiaxin Liu

h-index5
2papers
73citations

2 Papers

6.6GNMar 9, 2025
Evaluating and Aligning Human Economic Risk Preferences in LLMs

Jiaxin Liu, Yixuan Tang, Yi Yang et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in decision-making scenarios that involve risk assessment, yet their alignment with human economic rationality remains unclear. In this study, we investigate whether LLMs exhibit risk preferences consistent with human expectations across different personas. Specifically, we assess whether LLM-generated responses reflect appropriate levels of risk aversion or risk-seeking behavior based on individual's persona. Our results reveal that while LLMs make reasonable decisions in simplified, personalized risk contexts, their performance declines in more complex economic decision-making tasks. To address this, we propose an alignment method designed to enhance LLM adherence to persona-specific risk preferences. Our approach improves the economic rationality of LLMs in risk-related applications, offering a step toward more human-aligned AI decision-making.

3.3LGJan 15, 2022
Interpretable and Effective Reinforcement Learning for Attacking against Graph-based Rumor Detection

Yuefei Lyu, Xiaoyu Yang, Jiaxin Liu et al.

Social networks are frequently polluted by rumors, which can be detected by advanced models such as graph neural networks. However, the models are vulnerable to attacks and understanding the vulnerabilities is critical to rumor detection in practice. To discover subtle vulnerabilities, we design a powerful attacking algorithm to camouflage rumors in social networks based on reinforcement learning that can interact with and attack any black-box detectors. The environment has exponentially large state spaces, high-order graph dependencies, and delayed noisy rewards, making the state-of-the-art end-to-end approaches difficult to learn features as large learning costs and expressive limitation of graph deep models. Instead, we design domain-specific features to avoid learning features and produce interpretable attack policies. To further speed up policy optimization, we devise: (i) a credit assignment method that decomposes delayed rewards to atomic attacking actions proportional to the their camouflage effects on target rumors; (ii) a time-dependent control variate to reduce reward variance due to large graphs and many attacking steps, supported by the reward variance analysis and a Bayesian analysis of the prediction distribution. On three real world datasets of rumor detection tasks, we demonstrate: (i) the effectiveness of the learned attacking policy compared to rule-based attacks and current end-to-end approaches; (ii) the usefulness of the proposed credit assignment strategy and variance reduction components; (iii) the interpretability of the policy when generating strong attacks via the case study.