Axel Durbet

Axel Durbet, Kevin Thiry-Atighehchi, Dorine Chagnon et al.

In a biometric authentication or identification system, the matcher compares a stored and a fresh template to determine whether there is a match. This assessment is based on both a similarity score and a predefined threshold. For better compliance with privacy legislation, the matcher can be built upon a privacy-preserving distance. Beyond the binary output (`yes' or `no'), most schemes may perform more precise computations, e.g., the value of the distance. Such precise information is prone to leakage even when not returned by the system. This can occur due to a malware infection or the use of a weakly privacy-preserving distance, exemplified by side channel attacks or partially obfuscated designs. This paper provides an analysis of information leakage during distance evaluation. We provide a catalog of information leakage scenarios with their impacts on data privacy. Each scenario gives rise to unique attacks with impacts quantified in terms of computational costs, thereby providing a better understanding of the security level.

Axel Durbet, Paul-Marie Grollemund, Kevin Thiry-Atighehchi

A biometric recognition system can operate in two distinct modes: identification or verification. In the first mode, the system recognizes an individual by searching the enrolled templates of all the users for a match. In the second mode, the system validates a user's identity claim by comparing the fresh provided template with the enrolled template. The biometric transformation schemes usually produce binary templates that are better handled by cryptographic schemes, and the comparison is based on a distance that leaks information about the similarities between two biometric templates. Both the experimentally determined false match rate and false non-match rate through recognition threshold adjustment define the recognition accuracy, and hence the security of the system. To our knowledge, few works provide a formal treatment of security in case of minimal information leakage, i.e., the binary outcome of a comparison with a threshold. In this paper, we focus on untargeted attacks that can be carried out both online and offline, and in both identification and verification modes. On the first hand, we focus our analysis on the accuracy metrics of biometric systems. We provide the complexity of untargeted attacks using the False Match Rate (FMR) and the False Positive Identification Rate (FPIR) to address the security of these systems. Studying near-collisions with these metrics allows us to estimate the maximum number of users in a database, given a chosen FMR, to preserve the security and the accuracy. These results are evaluated on systems from the literature. On the other hand, we rely on probabilistic modelling to assess the theoretical security limits of biometric systems. The study of this metric space, and system parameters (template size, threshold and database size), gives us the complexity of untargeted attacks and the probability of a near-collision.

Axel Durbet, Paul-Marie Grollemund, Pascal Lafourcade et al.

Biometric systems are widely used for identity verification and identification, including authentication (i.e., one-to-one matching to verify a claimed identity) and identification (i.e., one-to-many matching to find a subject in a database). The matching process relies on measuring similarities or dissimilarities between a fresh biometric template and enrolled templates. The False Match Rate FMR is a key metric for assessing the accuracy and reliability of such systems. This paper analyzes biometric systems based on their FMR, with two main contributions. First, we explore untargeted attacks, where an adversary aims to impersonate any user within a database. We determine the number of trials required for an attacker to successfully impersonate a user and derive the critical population size (i.e., the maximum number of users in the database) required to maintain a given level of security. Furthermore, we compute the critical FMR value needed to ensure resistance against untargeted attacks as the database size increases. Second, we revisit the biometric birthday problem to evaluate the approximate and exact probabilities that two users in a database collide (i.e., can impersonate each other). Based on this analysis, we derive both the approximate critical population size and the critical FMR value needed to bound the likelihood of such collisions occurring with a given probability. These thresholds offer insights for designing systems that mitigate the risk of impersonation and collisions, particularly in large-scale biometric databases. Our findings indicate that current biometric systems fail to deliver sufficient accuracy to achieve an adequate security level against untargeted attacks, even in small-scale databases. Moreover, state-of-the-art systems face significant challenges in addressing the biometric birthday problem, especially as database sizes grow.

Axel Durbet, Pascal Lafourcade, Denis Migdal et al.

Cancelable biometric schemes aim at generating secure biometric templates by combining user specific tokens, such as password, stored secret or salt, along with biometric data. This type of transformation is constructed as a composition of a biometric transformation with a feature extraction algorithm. The security requirements of cancelable biometric schemes concern the irreversibility, unlinkability and revocability of templates, without losing in accuracy of comparison. While several schemes were recently attacked regarding these requirements, full reversibility of such a composition in order to produce colliding biometric characteristics, and specifically presentation attacks, were never demonstrated to the best of our knowledge. In this paper, we formalize these attacks for a traditional cancelable scheme with the help of integer linear programming (ILP) and quadratically constrained quadratic programming (QCQP). Solving these optimization problems allows an adversary to slightly alter its fingerprint image in order to impersonate any individual. Moreover, in an even more severe scenario, it is possible to simultaneously impersonate several individuals.