Jun Luo

Cameron Haigh, Zichen Zhang, Negar Hassanpour et al.

Design of Voltage-Controlled Oscillator (VCO) inductors is a laborious and time-consuming task that is conventionally done manually by human experts. In this paper, we propose a framework for automating the design of VCO inductors, using Reinforcement Learning (RL). We formulate the problem as a sequential procedure, where wire segments are drawn one after another, until a complete inductor is created. We then employ an RL agent to learn to draw inductors that meet certain target specifications. In light of the need to tweak the target specifications throughout the circuit design cycle, we also develop a variant in which the agent can learn to quickly adapt to draw new inductors for moderately different target specifications. Our empirical results show that the proposed framework is successful at automatically generating VCO inductors that meet or exceed the target specification.

John K. Tsotsos, Jun Luo

Learned systems in the domain of visual recognition and cognition impress in part because even though they are trained with datasets many orders of magnitude smaller than the full population of possible images, they exhibit sufficient generalization to be applicable to new and previously unseen data. Since training data sets typically represent small sampling of a domain, the possibility of bias in their composition is very real. But what are the limits of generalization given such bias, and up to what point might it be sufficient for a real problem task? Although many have examined issues regarding generalization, this question may require examining the data itself. Here, we focus on the characteristics of the training data that may play a role. Other disciplines have grappled with these problems, most interestingly epidemiology, where experimental bias is a critical concern. The range and nature of data biases seen clinically are really quite relatable to learned vision systems. One obvious way to deal with bias is to ensure a large enough training set, but this might be infeasible for many domains. Another approach might be to perform a statistical analysis of the actual training set, to determine if all aspects of the domain are fairly captured. This too is difficult, in part because the full set of variables might not be known, or perhaps not even knowable. Here, we try a different approach in the tradition of the Thought Experiment, whose most famous instance may be Schrödinger's Cat. There are many types of bias as will be seen, but we focus only on one, selection bias. The point of the thought experiment is not to demonstrate problems with all learned systems. Rather, this might be a simple theoretical tool to probe into bias during data collection to highlight deficiencies that might then deserve extra attention either in data collection or system development.

Elmira Amirloo, Mohsen Rohani, Ershad Banijamali et al.

While supervised learning is widely used for perception modules in conventional autonomous driving solutions, scalability is hindered by the huge amount of data labeling needed. In contrast, while end-to-end architectures do not require labeled data and are potentially more scalable, interpretability is sacrificed. We introduce a novel architecture that is trained in a fully self-supervised fashion for simultaneous multi-step prediction of space-time cost map and road dynamics. Our solution replaces the manually designed cost function for motion planning with a learned high dimensional cost map that is naturally interpretable and allows diverse contextual information to be integrated without manual data labeling. Experiments on real world driving data show that our solution leads to lower number of collisions and road violations in long planning horizons in comparison to baselines, demonstrating the feasibility of fully self-supervised prediction without sacrificing either scalability or interpretability.