Yang Yang

Zheng Li, Lijia Si, Caili Guo et al.

Text-based Person Retrieval (TPR) aims to retrieve person images that match the description given a text query. The performance improvement of the TPR model relies on high-quality data for supervised training. However, it is difficult to construct a large-scale, high-quality TPR dataset due to expensive annotation and privacy protection. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have approached or even surpassed human performance on many NLP tasks, creating the possibility to expand high-quality TPR datasets. This paper proposes an LLM-based Data Augmentation (LLM-DA) method for TPR. LLM-DA uses LLMs to rewrite the text in the current TPR dataset, achieving high-quality expansion of the dataset concisely and efficiently. These rewritten texts are able to increase the diversity of vocabulary and sentence structure while retaining the original key concepts and semantic information. In order to alleviate the hallucinations of LLMs, LLM-DA introduces a Text Faithfulness Filter (TFF) to filter out unfaithful rewritten text. To balance the contributions of original text and augmented text, a Balanced Sampling Strategy (BSS) is proposed to control the proportion of original text and augmented text used for training. LLM-DA is a plug-and-play method that can be easily integrated into various TPR models. Comprehensive experiments on three TPR benchmarks show that LLM-DA can improve the retrieval performance of current TPR models.

Yiling Kuang, Chao Yang, Yang Yang et al.

In high-stakes systems such as healthcare, it is critical to understand the causal reasons behind unusual events, such as sudden changes in patient's health. Unveiling the causal reasons helps with quick diagnoses and precise treatment planning. In this paper, we propose an automated method for uncovering "if-then" logic rules to explain observational events. We introduce temporal point processes to model the events of interest, and discover the set of latent rules to explain the occurrence of events. To achieve this, we employ an Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm. In the E-step, we calculate the likelihood of each event being explained by each discovered rule. In the M-step, we update both the rule set and model parameters to enhance the likelihood function's lower bound. Notably, we optimize the rule set in a differential manner. Our approach demonstrates accurate performance in both discovering rules and identifying root causes. We showcase its promising results using synthetic and real healthcare datasets.

Sishun Pan, Tingmin Li, Yang Yang

In this paper, we introduce our approach to the 5th CLVision Challenge, which presents distinctive challenges beyond traditional class incremental learning. Unlike standard settings, this competition features the recurrence of previously encountered classes and includes unlabeled data that may contain Out-of-Distribution (OOD) categories. Our approach is based on Winning Subnetworks to allocate independent parameter spaces for each task addressing the catastrophic forgetting problem in class incremental learning and employ three training strategies: supervised classification learning, unsupervised contrastive learning, and pseudo-label classification learning to fully utilize the information in both labeled and unlabeled data, enhancing the classification performance of each subnetwork. Furthermore, during the inference stage, we have devised an interaction strategy between subnetworks, where the prediction for a specific class of a particular sample is the average logits across different subnetworks corresponding to that class, leveraging the knowledge learned from different subnetworks on recurring classes to improve classification accuracy. These strategies can be simultaneously applied to the three scenarios of the competition, effectively solving the difficulties in the competition scenarios. Experimentally, our method ranks first in both the pre-selection and final evaluation stages, with an average accuracy of 0.4535 during the preselection stage and an average accuracy of 0.4805 during the final evaluation stage.