Tao Shao

Guanyi Qin, Jie Liang, Bingbing Zhang et al. · baidu

In this paper, we present an overview of the NTIRE 2026 challenge on the 3rd Restore Any Image Model in the Wild, specifically focusing on Track 1: Professional Image Quality Assessment. Conventional Image Quality Assessment (IQA) typically relies on scalar scores. By compressing complex visual characteristics into a single number, these methods fundamentally struggle to distinguish subtle differences among uniformly high-quality images. Furthermore, they fail to articulate why one image is superior, lacking the reasoning capabilities required to provide guidance for vision tasks. To bridge this gap, recent advancements in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) offer a promising paradigm. Inspired by this potential, our challenge establishes a novel benchmark exploring the ability of MLLMs to mimic human expert cognition in evaluating high-quality image pairs. Participants were tasked with overcoming critical bottlenecks in professional scenarios, centering on two primary objectives: (1) Comparative Quality Selection: reliably identifying the visually superior image within a high-quality pair; and (2) Interpretative Reasoning: generating grounded, expert-level explanations that detail the rationale behind the selection. In total, the challenge attracted nearly 200 registrations and over 2,500 submissions. The top-performing methods significantly advanced the state of the art in professional IQA. The challenge dataset is available at https://github.com/narthchin/RAIM-PIQA, and the official homepage is accessible at https://www.codabench.org/competitions/12789/.

Xinli Yue, JianHui Sun, Tao Shao et al.

Pairwise image quality assessment (IQA) in professional photography requires a model not only to identify the preferred image between two candidates, but also to provide convincing and image-grounded reasoning. In the NTIRE 2026 RAIM challenge, this requirement is further emphasized by jointly evaluating preference prediction and rationale generation. To address this task, we propose iDiff, an Interpretable Difference-aware framework for pairwise image quality assessment. Our method adopts a dual-branch design consisting of an Answer Model and a Thinking Model. The Answer Model performs robust preference prediction by explicitly decomposing each sample into left/right global and local views, followed by content-aware specialization for person and scene images and ensemble-based aggregation across backbones. The Thinking Model focuses on rationale generation and is progressively enhanced with expert-style templates, multi-source quality features, and answer-aware supervision conditioned on the Answer Model prediction. In this way, iDiff jointly models discriminative decision making and structured explanation, improving both robustness and interpretability. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework on both accuracy and reasoning-quality metrics. Our method achieved first place in the NTIRE 2026 RAIM challenge, showing the effectiveness of integrating explicit difference modeling with structured multimodal reasoning for pairwise IQA.

Zhaoran Zhao, Xinli Yue, Jianhui Sun et al.

Image Quality Assessment (IQA) has progressed from scalar quality prediction to more interpretable, human-aligned evaluation paradigms. In this work, we address the emerging challenge of detailed and explainable IQA by proposing iDETEX-a unified multimodal large language model (MLLM) capable of simultaneously performing three key tasks: quality grounding, perception, and description. To facilitate efficient and generalizable training across these heterogeneous subtasks, we design a suite of task-specific offline augmentation modules and a data mixing strategy. These are further complemented by online enhancement strategies to fully exploit multi-sourced supervision. We validate our approach on the large-scale ViDA-UGC benchmark, where iDETEX achieves state-of-the-art performance across all subtasks. Our model ranks first in the ICCV MIPI 2025 Detailed Image Quality Assessment Challenge, demonstrating its effectiveness and robustness in delivering accurate and interpretable quality assessments.